Front Running, Flash Orders, or Blackbox/Algorithmic Manipulation?

Quote from Carlos11:

I bet if you rooted for S.T.K a little more often you wouldn't get Hemsky'd so much in those dark pools.
__________________________________

What is S.T.K.? Sorry, still learning
 
Quote from eusdaiki:

Hmm... looks like I was wrong on this one... http://www.directedge.com/frequently_asked_questions.aspx?s=about

Regarding sending orders so that they don't interact with FLASH,

NSDQ SCNF, & SGNF orders, don't FLASH.

EDGX/A ROUX & ROUE orders don't FLASH either.


If sterling doesn't have em... maybe you want to drop sterling :)
_________________________________________________

Maybe i do need another platform. i don't have these NSDQ destinations or ROUE. Out of curiousity, what platform/broker do you use?
 
Quote from pacific7:

Quote from black diamond:



So in an electronic market how do you figure out which is which? I have never done it but I would guess you would start with some kind of statistical analysis of the order flow and whatever order characteristics you could see. But I would think that when someone clicks the "flash this order" checkbox it is a pretty strong signal that this is an order you want to fill, not join or frontrun!

_________________________________________________

Red_Inc or Black Diamond

Just out of curiousity, where do you trade and under what platform that gives you the option to flash your order (or not). I use sterling and do not have this option?

I trade with a Sub under Genesis and use the 'Laser' platform.
 
Quote from nassau:

That's what is important, algos have the right to go lightning fast to take your edge after your order is submitted, it's called competition.

I am trying to understand what you are saying?

To keep things simply I have a dozen traders here in Nassau.

We decide to play the futures today. We place working orders, they are submitted and excepted by the broker and so on.
Are you saying the likes of GS have / has a right, to bump me out of queue and take my contract?


w [/B][/QUOTE]

No, my statement wasn't clear. I wanted to say that as soon as
your order is displayed in the book, those algos have the right to step in front of you( improving your bid/ask 1 increment ). What is important is that algos can only improve after your order is placed and not before it has reached the book.
 
Quote from pacific7:

_________________________________________________

Maybe i do need another platform. i don't have these NSDQ destinations or ROUE. Out of curiousity, what platform/broker do you use?
I'm at Swift... we develop our own platform. :)
 
Quote from pacific7:

__________________________________

What is S.T.K.? Sorry, still learning

pacific7,

That comment was an attempt at some inside humor between myself and TripleD.

S.T.K. is an acronym that will simply remind TripleDTrader going forward that in order to be the best, you have to beat the best, and that just doesn’t seem likely anytime soon … does it Trip?

Getting ‘Hemsky’d’ loosely means taking it where the sun don’t shine, or, where the shine does shine if that’s somebody’s preference.:D
 
U.S. CFTC and U.K. FSA Will Jointly Monitor Markets (Update1)

Share | Email | Print | A A A

By Caroline Binham

Aug. 20 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission and the U.K. Financial Services Authority said they are boosting cooperation in their supervision of energy markets.

Each agency will also be able to conduct on-site visits of exchanges in the other’s jurisdiction as well as coordinate “emergency action” under the terms of the agreement, which covers U.S.-linked energy futures contracts. The CFTC will be able to inspect IntercontinentalExchance Inc.’s London market and the FSA can gather information at the New York Mercantile Exchange under the terms of the arrangement.

“We must effectively utilize all existing powers to ensure that futures markets remain free of manipulation, fraud or other market abuses,” said CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler in a statement. “Achieving this goal requires a coordinated international response.”

Trans-Atlantic differences in commodity-trading regulations were highlighted by U.S. and U.K. lawmakers over the past year. A former CFTC official said last year that the FSA’s lack of restrictions led to excessive speculation. FSA Chairman Adair Turner told a parliamentary committee in July 2008 that supply and demand, not speculation, was responsible for then-record oil prices, contradicting some U.S. lawmakers.

Increased cooperation between regulations around the world has been sought in the wake of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. It was among the pledges by global lawmakers when they met in London in April at the Group of 20 Nations’ summit.

Hedge-Fund Managers

“This is a U.S.-U.K. relationship and clearly there is a European angle,” said Jonathan Herbst, a regulatory lawyer at London based Norton Rose LLP and a former FSA official. “There have been sensitivities about a bilateral relationship but this just seems to be a practical relationship rather than one with legal ramifications. They want to send a message to the market of enhanced cooperation.”

The accord follows a meeting at the FSA with hedge-fund mangers, oil companies and traders earlier this month about whether U.K. regulation is transparent enough. Across the Atlantic, the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission today said they would discuss harmonizing regulatory policies.

“It is important that we continue to pursue all means to maintain fair, orderly and efficient markets, both nationally and internationally,” the FSA’s Turner said in a statement. “The measures announced today will help to facilitate coordinated action.”

‘Rigorous Surveillance’

While the FSA doesn’t mandate limits on a trader’s positions, it requires regulated companies to conform to general principles, including maintaining adequate controls and “position management.”

“ICE Futures Europe has a 30-year track record as a regulated futures exchange performing rigorous surveillance, regulatory and compliance functions,” said David Peniket, president of ICE Futures Europe in a statement. “We will continue to work with the FSA and CFTC to ensure full compliance.”

ICE already provides trade data to the CFTC through a deal with the FSA.

Crude oil rose 57 percent in the first six months of the year. The contract for September delivery advanced 2 cents, or 0.03 percent, to $72.44 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange as of 12:12 p.m. local time today.

To contact the reporters on this story: Caroline Binham in London at cbinham@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: August 20, 2009 13:18 EDT
 
I found an interesting article from WSJ:

By ARTHUR LEVITT JR.

The debate over high-frequency trading may seem remote and irrelevant to small investors. After all, they may think, if you’re only buying and selling stocks and mutual funds occasionally, what difference does it make whether some traders are able to move quickly in and out of those same stocks, squeezing an extra penny or two of profit here and there?

But this debate is not just about the rarified world of high-frequency traders, dominated by superfast computing and trading by advanced algorithms. It's fundamentally about the competitiveness and health of U.S. markets, and the ease with which all investors are able to find willing buyers and sellers. Small investors may never directly use a high-frequency trading strategy in their lives, but they have a very large stake in whether such strategies are regulated out of existence, as is now urged by some in Congress, the media and Wall Street.

High-frequency trading is, in many respects, just the next stage in the ongoing technological innovation of financial markets. Just as paper tickets for trades were replaced by computer orders, and the trading floor seen on television was made largely irrelevant by electronic exchanges, so has high-frequency trading revolutionized the way most U.S. stocks and related investment products are priced and sold.

High-frequency trading occurs when traders position very fast computers as close as possible to the stock market's computer servers to minimize the distance and time it takes for an order to pass through telecom lines. The traders then program those computers to analyze and react to incoming market data in mere fractions of a second.

Those fractions of a second translate into only slightly better margins in executing trades, but if done in large enough volume they add up to significant value. Because of that, roughly two-thirds of all U.S. daily stock volume is generated by high-frequency traders.

Due to the rise of high-frequency trading, investors both large and small enjoy a deeper pool of potential buyers and sellers, and a wider variety of ways to execute trades. There are today more than 30 execution venues—ranging from established global exchanges to a plethora of specialized markets—catering to the particular trading needs of institutions and individuals. Choice abounds, and investors now enjoy faster, more reliable execution technology and lower execution fees than ever before. All of that contributes significantly to market liquidity, a critical measure of market health and something all investors value.

Normally, this revolution in trading would be welcomed, but the practice of "flash trading," which has recently garnered negative headlines and regulatory action, has led some market observers to condemn high-frequency trading as a whole. This is a mistake. While I support the move to ban flash orders because they have the potential to undermine the goals of market competition, that does not mean we should demonize or regulate out of existence all high-frequency trading.

Some in Congress have suggested a tax on all trades of up to 25 basis points per trade, which would raise the per-transaction price on the purchase of a $20 stock to five cents from less than a penny now. Such a tax has been tried before—from 1914 to 1966, there was a transfer tax set at 0.2% on stock trades. But that expense was simply passed on to investors. Today, a tax on each stock transaction would probably drive high-frequency traders, and the liquidity they bring, to foreign markets.

Others simply assert that all high-frequency trading has no moral or underlying economic value, and that high-frequency trading is simply a game for those who want to profit from getting access to data a split-second ahead of someone else. The Securities and Exchange Commission should ignore these complaints and the caricature that has developed of high-frequency traders.

These traders have developed systems to allow them to beat the competition to displayed quotes. They have taken available space near the markets' data servers to squeeze time out of every transaction. These traders continuously look for inefficiencies, and by exploiting them, correct them. I see nothing sinister or unfair about the advantages that come out of their investments and efforts.

We should not set a speed limit to slow everyone down to the pace set by those unwilling or unable to compete at the highest levels of market activity. Investors large and small have always been served well by those looking to build the deepest possible pool of potential buyers and sellers, make trades at a better price, and all as quickly as possible.

More liquidity, better pricing and faster speeds are the building blocks of healthy and transparent markets, and we must always affirm those goals.

—Mr. Levitt was chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission from 1993 to 2001.
Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A17
 
Lately there are articles everywhere surfaces showing additional exemptions GS received and or compliance standards breached in relation to other Financial Institutions. By breached I am speaking about compliance issues that most Banks and Brokers must follow that GS received exemption from prior and during the supposed transfer to receiving a Bank status.

Todate they still do not have to play by the same rules as their colleagues.

GS has been given a free pass and get out of jail free card.

There are presently discussions with lawyers and the regulatory groups to fully define customer confidentuality and or conflict of interest obligations. Arms length transactions, boundaries of subsidiaries. The goal is to be legally able to further additionally share information that will give one or more of the subs the ability to trade under the pretense of a hedge when in reality it is imo inside trading.

Over the next month as the news starts to leak out we will experience imo extreme volitility similiar to last fall. I would anticipate low volume and premorning gaps will assist in covering of shorts and longs depending on the sentiment direction.

The traders here are now restricting their trades to certain hours, less position trading and trading the news for the few minutes there is volitility with moves outside the overall sentiment channel.

w
 
Quote from nassau:

Lately there are articles everywhere surfaces showing additional exemptions GS received and or compliance standards breached in relation to other Financial Institutions. By breached I am speaking about compliance issues that most Banks and Brokers must follow that GS received exemption from prior and during the supposed transfer to receiving a Bank status.

Todate they still do not have to play by the same rules as their colleagues.

GS has been given a free pass and get out of jail free card.

There are presently discussions with lawyers and the regulatory groups to fully define customer confidentuality and or conflict of interest obligations. Arms length transactions, boundaries of subsidiaries. The goal is to be legally able to further additionally share information that will give one or more of the subs the ability to trade under the pretense of a hedge when in reality it is imo inside trading.

Over the next month as the news starts to leak out we will experience imo extreme volitility similiar to last fall. I would anticipate low volume and premorning gaps will assist in covering of shorts and longs depending on the sentiment direction.

The traders here are now restricting their trades to certain hours, less position trading and trading the news for the few minutes there is volitility with moves outside the overall sentiment channel.

w
___________________________________________________

Nice post! Great info.
 
Back
Top