Quote from candletrader:
From reading the contents pages of Natenberg and McMillan on Amazon, it seems like McMillan runs through the strategies without incorporating the Greeks but that Natenberg first covers the Greeks...
Would you say, therefore, that Natenberg takes a more holistic approach to the strategies and is possibly of more value?
Or do you feel that the in-depth approach to strategies that McMillan uses is a better starting point?
I think the McMillan book is an excellant primer. Risk already had me purchase and read most of the books he has suggested on this thread and I will say wholeheartedly that the 3% of information I actually understood of the total availible knowledge found within Taleb, Natenburg, and Marlow books would have been more like 1% if I had not first taken the time to read McMillan's "Options as a Strategic Investment"...
Also pay no mind to Mr. Super Genius Arb when it comes to that Cottle book -- the shit reads like an advanced physics book to a novice (even looks like one with all those stupid charts)

