From reading the contents pages of Natenberg and McMillan on Amazon, it seems like McMillan runs through the strategies without incorporating the Greeks but that Natenberg first covers the Greeks...
Would you say, therefore, that Natenberg takes a more holistic approach to the strategies and is possibly of more value?
Or do you feel that the in-depth approach to strategies that McMillan uses is a better starting point?
Would you say, therefore, that Natenberg takes a more holistic approach to the strategies and is possibly of more value?
Or do you feel that the in-depth approach to strategies that McMillan uses is a better starting point?