No. Ban self-defense and open borders to Muslim extremists. That's a recipe for success.
Hug a suicide bomber, you Libertard fuck.
Hug a suicide bomber, you Libertard fuck.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
French Ambassador Attacks Trump
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
I don't disagree at all. Who could? It seems we both agree that Trump is wrong.
Videos of the concert massacre have been released. The place was dark. It was a turkey shoot.
If Parisians were armed to the teeth, the venue operators would have had a no gun policy. No armed citizens, armed to the teeth terrorists. The outcome doesn't change.
Trump doesn't think things through. Neither do his dittoheads.
Videos of the concert massacre have been released. The place was dark. It was a turkey shoot.
If Parisians were armed to the teeth, the venue operators would have had a no gun policy. No armed citizens, armed to the teeth terrorists. The outcome doesn't change.
Trump doesn't think things through. Neither do his dittoheads.
No. Ban self-defense and open borders to Muslim extremists. That's a recipe for success.
Hug a suicide bomber, you Libertard fuck.
I hugged your mama until I got deathly sick. The union lasted 2 seconds
Pussies like you are one of the reasons America is going down the shitter. Until you grow some balls and embrace Manhood, you might want to consider things before you open that stupid yapper.I hugged your mama until I got deathly sick. The union lasted 2 seconds
either way, I think the Paris attack increased our appetite for collateral damage. In that, if you are going to kill our innocent citizens, we will kill your innocent citizens. Schoolyards and hospitals will no longer be safe havens for you to hide behind.
the point here is during the democrat debate all there candidates seemed to use this tragedy to say we need greater gun control. Which makes no sense in light of the fact I read that paris and the rest have france have very restrictive gun control...
Citizens with guns might have made a difference in the Hebdo attack.
But.... what we all should have learned is that Gun control does not prevent terrorist attacks.
Open borders do not prevent terrorist's attacks.
Citizens with guns might have made a difference in the Hebdo attack.
But.... what we all should have learned is that Gun control does not prevent terrorist attacks.
Open borders do not prevent terrorist's attacks.
Last edited:
I'm cool with letting me live as free as I want with as many guns as I want and killing anybody who abuses that freedom. Isn't that already the law? Why do we need a new law?the point here is during the democrat debate all there candidates seemed to use this tragedy to say we need greater gun control. Which makes no sense in light of the fact I read that paris and the rest have france have very restrictive gun control...
Citizens with guns might have made a difference in the Hebdo attack.
But.... what we all should have learned is that Gun control does not prevent terrorist attacks.
Open borders does not prevent terrorist's attacks.
I think many of would accept the status quo... although here in CA we do have a ridiculous ban on mag size.
But, my concern is that many of our politicans are trying to take guns away from regular citizens with broad laws instead of developing specific measures to keep terrorist out and...
guns out of the hands of the mentally ill.
But, my concern is that many of our politicans are trying to take guns away from regular citizens with broad laws instead of developing specific measures to keep terrorist out and...
guns out of the hands of the mentally ill.
I'm cool with letting me live as free as I want with as many guns as I want and killing anybody who abuses that freedom. Isn't that already the law? Why do we need a new law?
Last edited:
"our politicans"? Who voted for your politicians? If it wasn't you it was your neighbor. We have plenty of laws. Not just gun laws but immigration laws and EPA laws and who knows how many laws. You can't hardly do anything without violatiing some kind of law. You just have to know what kind of laws you can break without being arrested. And it helps if you contribute and support your politician. We live in a lawless society with thousands of laws.I think many of would accept the status quo... although here in CA we do have a ridiculous ban on mag size.
But, my concern is that many of our politicans are trying to take guns away from regular citizens with broad laws instead of developing specific measures to keep terrorist out and...
gun out of the hands of the mentally ill.
1. our politicians get elected and then do the opposite of what they promised. you can't blame the voters for obamacare or letting all these potential terrorists in. We voted to seal the borders. For instance not only do we see Obama and Kerry spending money to bring in 10,000 practically unscreened people from syria... I see they "leader" Ryan won't commit to defunding that process.
This is why an non conservative... risky... candidate like trump is leading in the polls. Our current pols don't do what they say they will do.
2. you don't want to break law... because they give the power to the state (politicians in the long run) to selectively enforce them. you want fewer laws than we have. in my opinion.
This is why an non conservative... risky... candidate like trump is leading in the polls. Our current pols don't do what they say they will do.
2. you don't want to break law... because they give the power to the state (politicians in the long run) to selectively enforce them. you want fewer laws than we have. in my opinion.