Has this stealth vendor thread been banned yet?
To succeed in trading, you need to get the answer right on this question. A sheep goes up a mountain. It goes up 3 feet and falls back 2 feet per minute. The mountain is 70.5 feet high. How many min does it take the sheep to reach the top of the mountain.
The lesson in your anecdote is : there's more than one way to skin a cat, but only obstinate assholes go out of their way to pick the least efficient ways of doing it.Whether it's true or not is beside the point. Shakespeare's plays aren't "true", but they yet have lessons to teach.
One can, of course, miss the lesson, but that doesn't mean that it isn't there.

The lesson in your anecdote is : there's more than one way to skin a cat, but only obstinate assholes go out of their way to pick the least efficient ways of doing it.
But I'm sure that's not what the anecdote fabricator had in mind.![]()

Sorry but this anecdote fails in its intended purpose. The students were taught what a barometer was and how to use it to measure altitudes. There was no process of discovery. What the smartass demonstrated was that he was as smart as a caveman ("Me use rope!"), not that he was as smart as someone who deserved a passing grade in physics. Nobody said his answer was 'wrong' in the sense that it wouldn't work, but he was handed a barometer, not an extremely long rope and a dead weight. Thinking also means using common sense. He was being tested on class material, and he blew it. Me Use Rope is grade-school thinking, not physics-class thinking. I'm all for alternate solutions but when the best one is readily available as in this case, do the math.Depends on how much fun one has in thinking.
The lesson, of course, is in the last sentence. And it is particularly applicable to trading, since so many are so OCD about finding someone to "follow", i.e., finding someone who has "the answer". But if one studies the market itself, he eventually finds -- if he doesn't go broke first -- that there are many roads to profit.
Sorry but this anecdote fails in its intended purpose. The students were taught what a barometer was and how to use it to measure altitudes. There was no process of discovery. What the smartass demonstrated was that he was as smart as a caveman ("Me use rope!"), not that he was as smart as someone who deserved a passing grade in physics. Nobody said his answer was 'wrong' in the sense that it wouldn't work, but he was handed a barometer, not an extremely long rope and a dead weight. Thinking also means using common sense. He was being tested on class material, and he blew it. Me Use Rope is grade-school thinking, not physics-class thinking. I'm all for alternate solutions but when the best one is readily available as in this case, do the math.

Depends on how much fun one has in thinking.
The lesson, of course, is in the last sentence. And it is particularly applicable to trading, since so many are so OCD about finding someone to "follow", i.e., finding someone who has "the answer". But if one studies the market itself, he eventually finds -- if he doesn't go broke first -- that there are many roads to profit.
The last sentence is precisely the problem. It strikes me as some rightbot/libertarian add-on that is nowhere in the original presentation:Depends on how much fun one has in thinking.
The lesson, of course, is in the last sentence.