Quote from Sikhinvestor:
This was writing on the wall 7 years ago to be honest.
Eventually I see Hollywood dying a slow death by 2015.
Technically, true.Quote from Cdntrader:
lol this is garbage. you cant be free AND legal when it comes to movies, tv et all.
It's a Brave New World out there baby, but nothing happens until a salesman sells it.Quote from IanMacQuaide:
Technically, true.
But there's "LEGAL", and then there's accepted practice.
Ask any skool kid how many of his friends are serving time for downloading movies.
I'm not commenting on the morality or legality of it all, just the obvious.
We are seeing a generation that thinks it all should be
A. Free
B. Instantly available
Quote from IanMacQuaide:
Technically, true.
But there's "LEGAL", and then there's accepted practice.
Ask any skool kid how many of his friends are serving time for downloading movies.
I'm not commenting on the morality or legality of it all, just the obvious.
We are seeing a generation that thinks it all should be
A. Free
B. Instantly available
Quote from silver914:
I disagree. I am not a kid, but I do get just about everything via file sharing. What I and most file sharers object to is the cost. You can't convince me that a song off of a cd is worth a dollar. Especially when chances are I have already purchased that song, but it's more convenient to get it off a torrent than physically find my copy that I legitimately purchased.
If the RIAA and the MPAA took the licensing approach to content that the software industry has they would have a better argument, but as it is they want you to purchase the content every time you use it.
Most in the file sharing community would agree that if a song for example was ten cents you would eliminate the majority of the illegal activity. Or if Garmin sold map updates for $5 instead of $79. Or a movie purchase was the same as a rental ($1.00 or $1.99...whatever), but $19.95 for a movie you may or may not even like? I think not.
File sharing will never go away. There is no way around it. Even DRM couldn't stop it. The basic premise of the content provider's business model is what promotes file sharing. If on the other hand they made it cheap across the board where it was worth it to buy it, then most would buy their content.
You can teach anyone how to set up uTorrent on a wireless unprotected internet connection and they can get just about anything they want in just a few minutes. My dad wanted a few Louis Prima songs and I got him the entire collection of everything he ever did in ten minutes...free. Try to go out and find that at a brick and mortar store. Online you'd pay $100 or more. I think it all comes down to the forces of supply and demand. What content providers currently want you to pay is not what people are willing to pay and the content providers are more interested in taking a lot of money from a few people rather than a little money from a lot of people. Look at it this way...it doesn't cost the content provider any more to make a thousand digital copies than it does one digital copy.
Quote from silver914:
I disagree. I am not a kid, but I do get just about everything via file sharing. What I and most file sharers object to is the cost. You can't convince me that a song off of a cd is worth a dollar. Especially when chances are I have already purchased that song, but it's more convenient to get it off a torrent than physically find my copy that I legitimately purchased.
If the RIAA and the MPAA took the licensing approach to content that the software industry has they would have a better argument, but as it is they want you to purchase the content every time you use it.
Most in the file sharing community would agree that if a song for example was ten cents you would eliminate the majority of the illegal activity. Or if Garmin sold map updates for $5 instead of $79. Or a movie purchase was the same as a rental ($1.00 or $1.99...whatever), but $19.95 for a movie you may or may not even like? I think not.
File sharing will never go away. There is no way around it. Even DRM couldn't stop it. The basic premise of the content provider's business model is what promotes file sharing. If on the other hand they made it cheap across the board where it was worth it to buy it, then most would buy their content.
You can teach anyone how to set up uTorrent on a wireless unprotected internet connection and they can get just about anything they want in just a few minutes. My dad wanted a few Louis Prima songs and I got him the entire collection of everything he ever did in ten minutes...free. Try to go out and find that at a brick and mortar store. Online you'd pay $100 or more. I think it all comes down to the forces of supply and demand. What content providers currently want you to pay is not what people are willing to pay and the content providers are more interested in taking a lot of money from a few people rather than a little money from a lot of people. Look at it this way...it doesn't cost the content provider any more to make a thousand digital copies than it does one digital copy.