FRE/FNM have attempted to 'match' their revenues/profits over the expected time period of the mortgages/bonds/instruments involved. It's called 'smoothing' and it's been 'allowed' for some time by 'no objection' from their accountants and the regulators.
However, with all the TYC B.S. (cost me most of my account last year), the World Com fiasco (missed that one though) and others, the accountants and regulators are 'nervous' because they want FRE/FNM (and others such as SLM) to better 'fit' their revenue/profit recognition models as used by traditional banks and brokers. FRE (and FNM) have opposed this move and this is the result - the regulators, with the accountants' support, have threatened to slap them. They (FNM/FRE) have been dragging their feet getting the work done, the formulas re-programmed and the expensive audits 're-done'.
Unfortunately, it cost me over $16,000 today and who knows how much in the near future. Long term, I think it's NOT anything 'fraudulent' or 'illegal' or even unethical.
Good-Luck anyway.
However, with all the TYC B.S. (cost me most of my account last year), the World Com fiasco (missed that one though) and others, the accountants and regulators are 'nervous' because they want FRE/FNM (and others such as SLM) to better 'fit' their revenue/profit recognition models as used by traditional banks and brokers. FRE (and FNM) have opposed this move and this is the result - the regulators, with the accountants' support, have threatened to slap them. They (FNM/FRE) have been dragging their feet getting the work done, the formulas re-programmed and the expensive audits 're-done'.
Unfortunately, it cost me over $16,000 today and who knows how much in the near future. Long term, I think it's NOT anything 'fraudulent' or 'illegal' or even unethical.
Good-Luck anyway.