Fraudcurrents - NOAA just proved you were a fool

[WeToddDid2]

If you cannot prove it with the underlying data, you are simply regurgitating what you read like a mindless sheep. The article specifically states that "75 percent of the income ...... comes via unidentifiable sources."

Now that is considered a majority.

 

[futurecurrents]

SHOW ME THE PROOF. According to the article you posted, they DO NOT KNOW WHERE 75% of the money comes from.

OK Lucrum, this incarnation of you is now on ignore also. Who will you be next?

 

[Trader666]

OK Lucrum, this incarnation of you is now on ignore also. Who will you be next?

Do you fantasize about Lucrum when you have sex with your inflatable Obama boyfriend?

 

[WeToddDid2]

OK Lucrum, this incarnation of you is now on ignore also. Who will you be next?

I am not Lucrum.

So you can't offer up proof. Got it.

 

[futurecurrents]

Four Hiroshima sized bombs going off per second. That's how much extra radiative forcing due to the 40% increase in CO2 on the earth.

 

[WeToddDid2]

Four Hiroshima sized bombs going off per second. That's how much extra radiative forcing due to the 40% increase in CO2 on the earth.

Prove it!!!

 

[Trader666]

Four Hiroshima sized bombs going off per second. That's how much extra radiative forcing due to the 40% increase in CO2 on the earth.

Spare us your propaganda from skepticalscience, which you AGAIN tried to sneak by without providing a link. Here's how objective they are:

71 new papers reported in 2013 demonstrating the Sun controls climate, not man-made CO2
These papers don't exist according to paid climate propagandist John Cook of SS
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/01/71-new-papers-reported-in-2013.html

 

[Max E.]

Four Hiroshima sized bombs going off per second. That's how much extra radiative forcing due to the 40% increase in CO2 on the earth.

LOL!!!

 

[Trader666]

Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities...

Skeptical Science conspiracy theorist John Cook runs another survey trying to prove that false “97% of climate scientists believe in global warming” meme
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/...te-scientists-believe-in-global-warming-meme/

Climategate 3.0: Blogger Threatened for Exposing 97% “Consensus” Fraud
The 97-percent myth was launched last year by Australian global-warming activist John Cook and the alarmist website, SkepticalScience.com. Responsible scientists and sensible laymen were properly skeptical of the SkepticalScience claims from the get-go, but it took the investigative digging of independent blogger Brandon Shollenberger to expose how Cook was cooking the data.
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy...-for-exposing-97-consensus-fraud-2462932.html

Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring '97-Percent Consensus' Claims
Global warming alarmists and their allies in the liberal media have been caught doctoring the results of a widely cited paper asserting there is a 97-percent scientific consensus regarding human-caused global warming. Continued at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesta...caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/

 

[futurecurrents]

Solid peer reviewed science is behind the four atom bombs per second.

Of course ignorant deluded denier righties don't do science. Only blind ideology.

In fact global warming is now speeding up and is equal to twelve atom bombs per second in 2013

http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-not-slowing-its-speeding-up.html