Fraudcurrents - NOAA just proved you were a fool

11 signs a cooling is coming...

http://lenbilen.com/2014/07/01/eleven-signs-of-cooling-a-new-little-ice-age-coming/

here is one...

article-2093264-1180a549000005dc-715_468x290.jpg
 
And then there is the idiot GW denier righties. Perhaps the best evidence of just how stupid most righties are.

And deluded. Stupidity is fertile ground for delusion.

The science could not be clearer. The denial of it is mind boggling. It is not rational.
 
For all you deniers, climate change has been around forever - it comes in the form of winter, spring, summer, and fall.
 
For all you deniers, climate change has been around forever - it comes in the form of winter, spring, summer, and fall.



American Geophysical Union

"Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5
 

"Dark Money" Funds Climate Change Denial Effort

A Drexel University study finds that a large slice of donations to organizations that deny global warming are funneled through third-party pass-through organizations that conceal the original funder.

The largest, most-consistent money fueling the climate denial movement are a number of well-funded conservative foundations built with so-called "dark money," or concealed donations, according to ananalysis released Friday afternoon.

The study, by Drexel University environmental sociologist Robert Brulle, is the first academic effort to probe the organizational underpinnings and funding behind the climate denial movement.

It found that the amount of money flowing through third-party, pass-through foundations like DonorsTrust and Donors Capital, whose funding cannot be traced, has risen dramatically over the past five years.
In all, 140 foundations funneled $558 million to almost 100 climate denial organizations from 2003 to 2010.
Meanwhile the traceable cash flow from more traditional sources, such as Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, has disappeared.

"The climate change countermovement has had a real political and ecological impact on the failure of the world to act on global warming," Brulle said in a statement. "Like a play on Broadway, the countermovement has stars in the spotlight – often prominent contrarian scientists or conservative politicians – but behind the stars is an organizational structure of directors, script writers and producers."

Matter of democracy
In the end, Brulle concluded public records identify only a fraction of the hundreds of millions of dollars supporting climate denial efforts. Some 75 percent of the income of those organizations, he said, comes via unidentifiable sources.

And for Brulle, that's a matter of democracy. "Without a free flow of accurate information, democratic politics and government accountability become impossible," he said. "Money amplifies certain voices above others and, in effect, gives them a megaphone in the public square."

Powerful funders, he added, are supporting the campaign to deny scientific findings about global warming and raise doubts about the "roots and remedies" of a threat on which the science is clear.
"At the very least, American voters deserve to know who is behind these efforts."

http://www.scientificamerican....hange-denial-effort/
 

National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on climate change. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summarized:
Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as evidenced by increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, the widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.[5]
Most of the global warming since the mid-20th century is very likely due to human activities.[6]
Benefits and costs of climate change for [human] society will vary widely by location and scale.[7] Some of the effects in temperate and polar regions will be positive and others elsewhere will be negative.[7] Overall, net effects are more likely to be strongly negative with larger or more rapid warming.[7]
The range of published evidence indicates that the net damage costs of climate change are likely to be significant and to increase over time.[8]
The resilience of many ecosystems is likely to be exceeded this century by an unprecedented combination of climate change, associated disturbances (e.g. flooding, drought, wildfire, insects, ocean acidification) and other global change drivers (e.g. land-use change, pollution, fragmentation of natural systems, over-exploitation of resources).[9]
No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points; the last was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,[10] which in 2007[11] updated its 1999 statement rejecting the likelihood of human influence on recent climate with its current non-committal position.
 
And then there is the idiot GW denier righties. Perhaps the best evidence of just how stupid most righties are.

And deluded. Stupidity is fertile ground for delusion.

The science could not be clearer. The denial of it is mind boggling. It is not rational.

Maybe it's just the way you write, but it sounds like they get you going. You're never going to change their mind on this subject, nor they, yours. And if you believe they should change their minds, no doubt they think the same of you. But if you let them get you riled up, then they have something that day, no matter how trivial, that they can feel they've accomplished. Why give them that? If they're calling you names, you're winning.

That said, we all drop our guard occasionally. But it might be a bit more than occasionally for you, futurecurrents. : )
 
You forgot to mention that futurecurrents likes tossing his gay brothers salad.

Maybe it's just the way you write, but it sounds like they get you going. You're never going to change their mind on this subject, nor they, yours. And if you believe they should change their minds, no doubt they think the same of you. But if you let them get you riled up, then they have something that day, no matter how trivial, that they can feel they've accomplished. Why give them that? If they're calling you names, you're winning.

That said, we all drop our guard occasionally. But it might be a bit more than occasionally for you, futurecurrents. : )
 
Back
Top