France's Top Weatherman Suspended Over 'Wrong' Views on Climate Change

I want the US to be a sovereign nation and not subject to the whims of euro elites. Kind of like why the Founders came here in the first place. You probably are more comfortable having decisions made for you by unelected bureaucrats in Belgium.
Clearly you've never tasted their chocolate.
 
Personally, I think denial is more along the lines of batshit crazy. Building on that foundation, I don't think batshit crazy should be encouraged.

So no dissenting opinions from the liberal perspective should be allowed. Anyone who has a differing view will be locked up in prison.

Sounds like the policy of Stalin and Chairman Mao.

Next you will be proposing death camps.

Talk about batshit crazy.
 
So no dissenting opinions from the liberal perspective should be allowed. Anyone who has a differing view will be locked up in prison.

Sounds like the policy of Stalin and Chairman Mao.

Next you will be proposing death camps.

Talk about batshit crazy.
Do you buy your straw wholesale?
 
Personally, I think denial is more along the lines of batshit crazy. Building on that foundation, I don't think batshit crazy should be encouraged.

♫ The Inquistion, what a show
The Inquistion, here we go
We know you're wishing
That we'd go away
But the Inquistion's here and it's here to stay
The Inquistion, oh boy
The Inquistion, what a joy
The Inquistion, oy oy ♫
 
Good, he should be sent to jail and then executed. Off with his head.

If this is what you think should be done to dissenters, then i wonder what you think we should do to the people who install globull warming producing air conditioning systems for a living.
 
Start by imprisoning everyone who told us back in the 70's that a new ice age threatened the world. If they're still alive, lock them up.
 
These ever more extreme calls for silencing dissenting opinion demonstrate the very weakness of their argument. If the case for AGW were as overwhelmingly obvious as they claim, no such prosecutions would be necessary to shut down contrary opinion. The marketplace of ideas would perform that function, as it does with other Flat Earth claims.

The truth is they have only a theory, not a scientific truth. It cannot be proven empirically, nor are there data that confirm it. Even their models are full of fudge factors. Unwavering belief in it is more in the realm of religion than science. AGW represents the unhappy copnfluence of politically motivated and financially compromised "scientists" and self-interested pols in both the first and third worlds.
 
If anyone should be prosecuted it's these capitalist corporate scumbags...


  • By 1978 Exxon’s senior scientists were telling top management that climate change was real, caused by man, and would raise global temperatures by 2-3C this century, which was pretty much spot-on.
  • By the early 1980s they’d validated these findings with shipborne measurements of CO2 (they outfitted a giant tanker with carbon sensors for a research voyage) and with computer models that showed precisely what was coming. As the head of one key lab at Exxon Research wrote to his superiors, there was “unanimous agreement in the scientific community that a temperature increase of this magnitude would bring about significant changes in the earth’s climate, including rainfall distribution and alterations in the biosphere”.
  • And by the early 1990s their researchers studying the possibility for new exploration in the Arctic were well aware that human-induced climate change was melting the poles. Indeed, they used that knowledge to plan their strategy, reporting that soon the Beaufort Sea would be ice-free as much as five months a year instead of the historic two. Greenhouse gases are rising “due to the burning of fossil fuels,” a key Exxon researcher told an audience of engineers at a conference in 1991. “Nobody disputes this fact.”
But of course Exxon did dispute that fact. Not inside the company, where they used their knowledge to buy oil leases in the areas they knew would melt, but outside, where they used their political and financial might to make sure no one took climate change seriously.

They helped organise campaigns designed to instil doubt, borrowing tactics and personnel from the tobacco industry’s similar fight. They funded “institutes” devoted to outright climate denial. And at the highest levels they did all they could to spread their lies.
 
Back
Top