The chaos in the UK grows day by day. Now even the parliament is going to try to find out what they wish:
- leave
- stay
- anything in between
Cameron started with the creation of a monster in 2016 ( and quickly ran away leaving the UK with the problems) and today the UK feels the consequences of that.
The problem with democracy is that all people who are allowed to vote have the same importance. This problem exists in every democracy, not only in the UK. Just being old enough is what is needed to vote. No check if you have any clue what the vote is all about. So the biggest idiot has the same vote as the biggest expert in that specific area. That causes a lot of trouble.
Brexit is just one example of this phenomena. Not allowing the 10% biggest idiots to vote might have given a totally different outcome.
If they would do a test to check who really has any idea about what Brexit would really mean, probably 30-60% would never pass the test. It is therefore not logical that every person who can vote today should be able to vote.
And social media is manipulating everything so hard that it even make things worse. People who understand what the vote is about will be not much be influenced, while the "idiots" will be influenced a lot for two reasons: they don't know what the vote is about so cannot judge on the vale of what is posted in social media; and they miss the intelligence to understand that they are manipulated.
Compare it with trading: for trading you only need a few dollars and open an account.
That's why most fail.
In referenda or elections that is similar:all you need is have the legal age to vote, and go to vote. That's why many vote wrong.
If you would go for a life saving surgery, who should decide how they should operate you?
The surgeon? Or should it be democratic and should all people working in the hospital vote what the doctor should do? Including the janitors, the man who maintains the gardens and the electricians?
When I was still working, our company had about 10,000 employees. But the management team (9 persons including myself) had weekly meetings and decided on all financial issues. If it should be like in elections and referenda, 10,000 people should have together decided what the company should do. Luckily that never happened, it would have been a financial nightmare as the majority of these 10,000 have no clue about finances (but had other qualifications that we had not).