Quote from Mav88:
yes, quite true. The hurst exponent but be exactly 1/2 in order for the fractal description to imply randomness. Many times it is not.
In any event it is easy to see that the pure fractal model breaks down for markets. Just open up a tick chart and you can see that scale invariance is not held.
Quote from maxpi:
One guy's narrow range inside bar is another guy's Bollinger narrowing and could be another guys doji...
One guy's trend reversal is another guy's continuation...
One guy's stop placement is another guy's bread and butter...
One guy's noise is another's volatility...
Quote from Arthur Deco:
It is terminally fucking stupid to describe the markets as "fractal", implying that they are random.
Quote from dtrader98:
Ironically, the properties of fractal behavior imply quite the opposite.
As to anyone interested in fractal education (not the maligned TA version), what better source than reading literature from the original source himself, b. mandelbrot.
There are several easily accessible layman's books authored by mandelbrot; go pick them up and spend some time reading them.