Fox's Shep Smith fact-checks Trump's Amazon claims: 'None of that was true'

Poindexter said:
Such a great job that they have more than $120 billion in unfunded pension & healthcare liabilities and debt.

Such a great job that the GAO said in a report last year that USPS is a deteriorating, unsustainable financial mess.
More...

When you have to prefund future payments to retirees for the next 75 years in a ten-year time span, what do you think would have happened?

The GAO is saying what it is saying because of the 2006 law that forced this insane requirement on USPS, you Cons first destroy institutions and then pretend as if it just happened.
 
gaslighting is now asking a journalist that a journalist have support for his statement when he says the president got it all wrong?

Tell us after all expenses are accounted for - is the USPS making on the Amazon contract.
===
Finally you bullshitting troll I am not saying Trump was right I said he statement seemed to lack support.

I explained shep was wrong and you have a problem with that because you can't show he was correct.

you have the issue here.... not me.



exGOPer said:
Economic sense means that the business venture shows a promise of good return on investment. The fact that there is a commission setup to do this and that commission approved the deals shows the exact opposite of what you are claiming. Stop trying to gaslight with your BS about 'nobody knows', if nobody knows then STFU, don't go around lying all the time about everything which is what Trump does.
More...
 
exGOPer said:
When you have to prefund future payments to retirees for the next 75 years in a ten-year time span, what do you think would have happened?
More...
BS leftist/postal workers union talking points. The 2006 law didn't create liabilities, it required USPS to account for and fund the present value of their actual liabilities.

exGOPer said:
The GAO is saying what it is saying because of the 2006 law that forced this insane requirement on USPS, you Cons first destroy institutions and then pretend as if it just happened.
More...
Wrong. Here's a screenshot of what GAO actually said, some of which was in my earlier posts and went right over your head.

If the 2006 bipartisan legislation was so bad, why didn't Obama fix it during his eight years? Because the problem's not the law or "Cons," it's the USPS. According to Postal Service, the 2006 law also "provided new flexibility, particularly in competitive pricing for shipping services, enabling the Postal Service to respond to dynamic market conditions and changing customer needs for packages." Ooops. How'd that work out?

gao - Copy.png
 
Poindexter said:
BS leftist/postal workers union talking points. The 2006 law didn't create liabilities, it required USPS to account for and fund the present value of their actual liabilities.


Wrong. Here's what GAO actually said, some of which was in my earlier posts which went right over your head.

If the 2006 bipartisan legislation was so bad, why didn't Obama fix it during his eight years? Because the problem's not the law or "Cons," it's the USPS. According to Postal Service, the law also "provided new flexibility, particularly in competitive pricing for shipping services, enabling the Postal Service to respond to dynamic market conditions and changing customer needs for packages." Ooops. How'd that work out?

View attachment 184497
More...

The very GAO article talks about 'required ..payments' which is exactly what I am talking about. Nice try, you failed again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top