Really? Then you have never run one.
You really want to make a statement without supporting fact?
You are lowering yourself to the average ET right wing troll now.
In truth if you sell a product for profit, it is predatory.
Simply not true. You can sell a product without trying to prey upon the buyer or not provide goods and services fairly.
Tell that to WalMart, and the many many businesses they have euthanzied.
Wal Mart is a symptom of the disease of consumerism. They have destroyed communities. They are not in the business of providing quality goods and services to a community. They are in the business of selling cheap shit to people who are addicted to consumerism, or poor people who have no choice but to slum their way to Wal Mart. It is all about price at Wal Mart, not about the quality of workmanship of the products they sell.
Again, Wal Mart is a symptom of the disease of consumerism.
Okay, I will work on that
Work on what? Making claims without evidence?
relative to the business they are in, yes they do, I just posted that.
With one minor product that they purchased there is a law suit. That is hardly a proof of across the board practices equivalent to Fox News.
In a debate, you have thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, when discussing this, the debater make relevant comparisons to prove a point, this is standard collegiate practice.
Not necessarily. You didn't qualify your question, you asked a poor open ended question. Had you qualified your question in the beginning, you would have gotten a different answer. Just man up and admit you asked a poor question.
You didn't do that, you made some unproved assumption again.
Silly is a derogatory adjective meant to cast dispersion on the debater, this is called an ad hom, and is considered poor taste
If the question wasn't silly, you would not have needed to restate it in a different format.
Fox News is yellow journalism. Sizzle with no steak.
[color] Name a company that is not[/color]
Already done.
And what facts can you present that put them as clearly more corrupt?
Does it really matter who is more or less corrupt?
Fox News is corrupt, you are denying that?
This entire statement is a derogatory missive meant to cast dispersion on the debater, this is called an ad hom, and is considered poor taste
Poor taste is admiring organized crime.
