To sum up:
6. The measurement of a President’s relative ranking among other Presidents is subjective and is the opinion of likely politically biased historians.
Yet republicans like Reagan and Eisenhower rank high in their rankings.
To sum up:
6. The measurement of a President’s relative ranking among other Presidents is subjective and is the opinion of likely politically biased historians.
7. Fact Checkers are biased and tend to support Leftist media.
Trumps approval ratings told us long before Nov that he was a 1 term president![]()
8. Obama’s Presidential rank by historians is not credible because his popularity as measured by votes received went down when he ran for reelection.
9. Voters, assuming only valid ballots were counted, have much more confidence in Biden than Obama, 81 million to 69 million votes respectively, further implying Obama was a dud by historical standards.
All rankings rank republicans like Eisenhower and Reagan as great presidents,some of them list them higher than Clinton and Obama. That proves your argument that a republican can't be ranked as a great president false.10. Trump’s historical ranking depends on whether the source putting the list together is Left leaning or Right leaning.
Edit: 11. Polls are consistently biased against the Republican Presidential candidate for the purpose of suppressing his vote while encouraging Democrat voters to support the opposing candidate.
As a side note, didn’t Obama get a Thumping in the House, Senate, and Governorships during his second term? Obama may not have been the worse President ever, but he ain’t looking too pretty!
Obama may not have been the worse President ever, but he ain’t looking too pretty!
Bull1Shit2 breathes a pure methane trump atmosphere. Very stuffy.