Being reasonable is to detach and see that both creationism and random chance production of mankind are both steeped in mythology and lack of proof or fact.
What is most illogical is that your position is that men made up the creation myth, but men didn't not make up the men from monkeys by random chance myth?
Both are the product of human guesswork...
The atheist explain everything away with the Godlike mysterious and magical force of "random unguided" things happening to create the universe, create life, mutate life, etc.
It is just a story they tell, it is nothing even resembling some factual reporting.
If you stick to factual reporting, there is no evidence of some magical random force doing anything near what the atheists attribute it to be...
Just get real, and promote your story...but it is just a story and a myth until facts take it out of the realm of man's imagination...
There is no evidence for this random force that is the cornerstone of the evolutionary myth.
It could be programmed change for a purpose just as easily as it could be random meaningless change...
Take away the anti God position and just stick with the facts, and the fact is that we don't know, so stop the guessing and proselytizing of your religion on the masses...
Bottom line it:
1. There is no known fact of causation.
2. Lacking known fact of causation doesn't mean that there is no causation, or that unplanned unguided random forces shaped our universe.
Truly, if you were to think deeply about all of this (won't happen, you are not a deep thinker) there is no logical foundation for the perpetuation of the universe or even the flow of evolution if the primary force driving evolution is randomness, and it is just as likely that some "mutation" would have come along and destroyed all forms of life, if not even the entire universe.
Science looks for constants and builds on those, the ability to test and predict on the basis of those constants.
Randomness that causes change?
No constant force, no ability to predict, no ability to test this so called force, no mathematical equation of the so called force of randomness...
Yet presented as science?
Poppycock, foolishness, man's ego driven to think he understands by making up a God of randomness who willy-nilly just produces change for no reason and no causation?.
Modern science has most people conned, as they make this first assumption and build their house of straw saying "it is the best model."
Laughable, truly laughable...
Quote from killthesunshine:
c'mon even you know the two aren't even close in comparison.
be reasonable, far far more evidence for evolution than creationism.
(for those of us that see the utility to rationality) 
