Fox News Is Still Talking About Hillary Clinton

Vox: “Since Trump’s inauguration, Fox News has consistently covered Clinton more than other cable news channels — by a wide margin.”

”If you forced a robot to watch Fox News for the last six months — which is what the TV News Archive did — it would’ve seen Clinton’s face more than 2,000 times. That’s six times more than CNN.”
 
What does Nielsen have to say about Fox?


http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/top10s.html

1 FIFA WORLD CUP QF L (BRAZIL/BELGIUM) FOX SPORTS 1 2.2 3,519
2 HANNITY SPECIAL FOX NEWS CHANNEL 2.1 3,125
3 TIME MACHINE HISTORY 2.0 3,476
4 TUCKER CARLSON TONIGHT FOX NEWS CHANNEL 1.9 2,920
5 HANNITY FOX NEWS CHANNEL 1.9 2,850
6 TUCKER CARLSON TONIGHT FOX NEWS CHANNEL 1.8 2,740
6 WWE ENTERTAINMENT USA NETWORK 1.7 2,828
8 HANNITY FOX NEWS CHANNEL 1.7 2,643
9 INGRAHAM ANGLE, THE FOX NEWS CHANNEL 1.7 2,600
10 FIFA WORLD CUP QF L (URUGUAY/FRANCE) FOX SPORTS 1 1.7 2,548
 
What does Nielsen have to say about Fox?


http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/top10s.html

1 FIFA WORLD CUP QF L (BRAZIL/BELGIUM) FOX SPORTS 1 2.2 3,519
2 HANNITY SPECIAL FOX NEWS CHANNEL 2.1 3,125
3 TIME MACHINE HISTORY 2.0 3,476
4 TUCKER CARLSON TONIGHT FOX NEWS CHANNEL 1.9 2,920
5 HANNITY FOX NEWS CHANNEL 1.9 2,850
6 TUCKER CARLSON TONIGHT FOX NEWS CHANNEL 1.8 2,740
6 WWE ENTERTAINMENT USA NETWORK 1.7 2,828
8 HANNITY FOX NEWS CHANNEL 1.7 2,643
9 INGRAHAM ANGLE, THE FOX NEWS CHANNEL 1.7 2,600
10 FIFA WORLD CUP QF L (URUGUAY/FRANCE) FOX SPORTS 1 1.7 2,548
Wait! What!? Where is CNN?

Perhaps if they talked about Hillary more CNN could get on the list.
 
I especially like the part where no group of people could stomach watching fox and they had to get a robot.
People probably didn't like the idea of the tape on their eyelids. I mean screw modern technology and those app thangys. I mean who knows how to code anyways. Screw efficiency. They could have just used a stone age technique and made someone watch Fox News 24 hours a day.
 
People probably didn't like the idea of the tape on their eyelids. I mean screw modern technology and those app thangys. I mean who knows how to code anyways. Screw efficiency. They could have just used a stone age technique and made someone watch Fox News 24 hours a day.

That's why I said "group of people". I know reading comprehension is not your forte, but for a study like this it may be cheaper in the short term to hire a few individuals at minimum wage rather than pay for an AI program to do the same.

Or you could just read the definition of a joke.
 
That's why I said "group of people". I know reading comprehension is not your forte, but for a study like this it may be cheaper in the short term to hire a few individuals at minimum wage rather than pay for an AI program to do the same.

Or you could just read the definition of a joke.
uhhhhh....I think that it is you that needs to look up the definition of a joke.

Blahahahaa.....You actually tried to make an argument against my sarcastic joke.

Wow! It was just a joke. Let it go. Why do you feel this deep desire to be right all the time?
 
uhhhhh....I think that it is you that needs to look up the definition of a joke.

Blahahahaa.....You actually tried to make an argument against my sarcastic joke.

Wow! It was just a joke. Let it go. Why do you feel this deep desire to be right all the time?
giphy.gif
 
Fox News Is Still Talking About Hillary Clinton


And why shouldn't they!!!? Look at what she just said. Its kinda like me and that Desterio idiot.... he won't shut up. So somebody has to say something.

Fox news is only covering the news. Why should she be allowed to say something as outrageous as "Kavavaugh's nomination will set our nation back 150 years" unchecked?!
Thats what the press is for. Fox will stop covering her when she S'sTFU.
__________________________________

Vox: “Since Trump’s inauguration, Fox News has consistently covered Clinton more than other cable news channels — by a wide margin.”

”If you forced a robot to watch Fox News for the last six months — which is what the TV News Archive did — it would’ve seen Clinton’s face more than 2,000 times. That’s six times more than CNN.”
Hillary Says Kavanaugh's Nomination Made Her Fear Republicans Wanted to Set US Back to 1850s

SAM DORMAN | JUL 14, 2018 | 2:21 PM
e98f2ffc1545b4363694827fa0e43282.svg
Comment
1fdbef17762066a2506c7c5c3783b269.svg
Share on Facebook
Michael Kovac/Getty Images
Progressives weren't shy about showing their dismay with President Donald Trump's newest nomination to the United States Supreme Court.
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, for example, warned that Kavanaugh's confirmation would “threaten the lives of millions of Americans.”
While many worried Kavanaugh would impact a host of political issues, former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton suggested that Republicans were trying to take the U.S. back to a time when Americans still had slaves.
Leah Milis/Reuters
During a speech on Friday, Clinton said that while she used to think that Republicans “wanted to turn the clock back to the 1950s,” she started worrying that “they want to turn it back to the 1850s.”
“This nomination holds out the threat of devastating consequences for workers' rights, civil rights, LGBT rights, women's rights, including those to make our own health care decision,” she said.
Although Clinton didn't explain exactly what she meant in terms of returning to 1850, she did describe the nomination as “a blatant attempt by this administration to shift the balance of the court for decades and to reverse decades of progress.”
Watch:

In 1850, women didn't have the right to vote and the U.S. still allowed slavery. It also passed the Fugitive Slave Act which required northerners to return slaves who escaped and made it to free soil.
“Stakes could not be higher,” Clinton added as many have worried that Kavanaugh would replace Kennedy and provide conservatives with the slight majority they needed to strip away abortion access.
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) worried that civil rights hung “in the balance” with Kavanaugh's nomination.
In a statement, the organization suggested that America had trouble abiding by the spirit of the Fourteenth Amendment, the constitutional provision that prohibited discrimination in individual states.
“150 years after its passage, our nation still struggles to realize the promise of equality under the Fourteenth Amendment,” it said. “The next appointment to the Supreme Court is pivotal to that struggle.”
 
Back
Top