You seem to be saying Michelle Obama is not a trans. Provide your evidence please, or continue to look stupid.
And provide evidence that Jarret is in no wise any kind of supremacist.
Fox News’ Geraldo Rivera, Dana Perino Call Out Trump for Failing to Condemn Roseanne’s Racism
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
And provide evidence that Jarret is in no wise any kind of supremacist.
Hahaha what a simp. Hey prove a negative
The truth is you don't know.
The truth is you don't know what one of the oldest debate fallacies in the book is and you look a fool.
Good1 the gambler chump never finished school I expect.
Hey prove a negative
"Proving a negative" is not a debate fallacy. In mathematics, they're called negative proofs or proofs of impossibility.
Famous example: Wiles proved (Fermat's Last Theorem) that there exist no non-zero integer solutions to x^n + y^n = z^n for x, y and z when n>2.
Fascinating. The more stupid a person is, the less he is likely to know it. Well done, Good1. How is the view from the apex?
Its ok Poin, my niece is an aspie. Her mother's side remarkably so my comments before on your struggling with normal language are really just observation, no serious malice. A colloquialism (I know you have problems there) relating to burden of proof.
Many people did not know Roosevelt fell cripple because the media supported him.
If the media supported Baraks marriage to a trans, you might not know the difference.
You still don't know, and don't have any evidence to prove otherwise.
For me, the issue is not whether it's OK, it's about deception on a mass scale. That opens the door to questions about other mass deceptions.
There are plenty red flags that you choose to ignore given confirmation bias syndrome. There are enough red flags that it is more incumbent upon you to pose evidence thier marriage is as it was meant to appear.
There are so many red flags involved that yes, you look stupid for insisting circumstances are exactly as they are meant to appear.