Fox News analyst warns Trump is'locking down the intelligence community for his purposes'

https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-analyst-trump-locking-down-intelligence-community-1451620

Mary Anne Marsh, a political analyst for Fox News, raised concerns on Monday that President Donald Trump appeared to be consolidating his control over the U.S. intelligence community with the nomination of GOP Representative John Ratcliffe to replace Dan Coats as director of national intelligence.

"It's more about protecting Trump than America," Marsh, who previously served as a senior adviser to Democratic Senator John Kerry, warned during a segment of Fox News' America's Newsroom on Monday. "John Ratcliffe has been all over the investigate the investigators [probe], who's doing that right now? [Attorney General] Bill Barr, so Donald Trump has consolidated his control over the intelligence committees at a time when he's given Barr unprecedented access and control over all the intelligence information, which we've never seen by an attorney general before," she said.

"Now he adds Ratcliffe," the analyst asserted. "So this is Trump locking down the intelligence community for his purposes, not national security purposes."


Trump reportedly long aimed to replace Coats, a Republican, as he did not see him as loyal enough to his administration. On Sunday, the president announced that Coats would be leaving office on August 15 and that he had nominated Ratcliffe, who represents Texas, as his replacement.

"I am pleased to announce that highly respected Congressman John Ratcliffe of Texas will be nominated by me to be the Director of National Intelligence. A former U.S. Attorney, John will lead and inspire greatness for the Country he loves," the president wrote in a tweet.

Republican Senator Richard Burr, who represents North Carolina and is the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, suggested in a Monday statement that Ratcliffe's nomination would quickly be approved by his committee. "When the White House submits its official nomination to the Senate Intelligence Committee, we will work to move it swiftly through regular order," Burr said, NPR reported.

Some experts have raised concerns about Ratcliffe's lack of experience when it comes to national intelligence. "Ratcliffe would be the first DNI without significant intelligence or ambassadorial experience," John McLaughlin, a former Deputy Director of the CIA, pointed out on Twitter. "Dan Coats has done superbly the main thing a DNI must do: present the collective view of the intelligence community in a fair, objective, and non-partisan way."

As Marsh explained, Ratcliffe has been a staunch supporter of the president, particularly in the wake of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference and its alleged involvement with the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election.

"So Americans need to know this, as they listen to the Democrats and socialists on the other side of the aisle, as they do dramatic readings from this report: that Volume 2 of this report was not authorized under the law to be written. It was written to a legal standard that does not exist at the Justice Department," he argued during Mueller's testimony to the House Judiciary and House Intelligence Committees last week. "And it was written in violation of every DOJ [Department of Justice] principle about extra-prosecutorial commentary," the congressman said.

As Democratic lawmakers continue to investigate allegations against Trump and his administration, as well as push for legislation to challenge Russian election interference, Ratcliffe would serve in a prominent role that he could potentially use to shield the president.
Do you mean like this?

Eric Holder: 'I'm still the president's wingman'

https://www.politico.com/blogs/politico44/2013/04/eric-holder-im-still-the-presidents-wingman-160861

"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy. So we’ll see," Holder said in an interview on the Tom Joyner radio show.
 
Gee, a former staffer to John Kerry does not want to see Trump hire any people who support Trump. Who woulda thunk?

And yes, the swamp needs to be worried with Johnny Ratcliffe, Bill Barr, and Durham on the scene. Deal with it.

Nothing claimed in the original article and analysis posted is untrue so if your best response is just deal with it then Russia meddling means nothing to you.

Remember if we state there was no collusion or obstruction of justice, there is still no doubt that Russia attempted to.interfere in the elections by whatever means. The only one who denies this is Trump, his followers, and sheeple he nominates to take over.

You can cry about meddling in 2016 under Obama but why when he took office Trump then denies it ever happened? You dont see how fucktarded that logic is? Did meddling stop in 2018 and planned next year suddenly?
What is Trump doing to combat this now he is in power?
Sucking Putin's dick and replacing anyone who states Russia conducted and still conducts meddling activities.

So.much for genius negotiator....I thought you were supposed.to be firm, not bleed from your.vag.
 
Nothing claimed in the original article and analysis posted is untrue so if your best response is just deal with it then Russia meddling means nothing to you.

Remember if we state there was no collusion or obstruction of justice, there is still no doubt that Russia attempted to.interfere in the elections by whatever means. The only one who denies this is Trump, his followers, and sheeple he nominates to take over.

You can cry about meddling in 2016 under Obama but why when he took office Trump then denies it ever happened? You dont see how fucktarded that logic is? Did meddling stop in 2018 and planned next year suddenly?
What is Trump doing to combat this now he is in power?
Sucking Putin's dick and replacing anyone who states Russia conducted and still conducts meddling activities.

So.much for genius negotiator....I thought you were supposed.to be firm, not bleed from your.vag.

No one doubts Russia tried to meddle in the elections, the influence they had is highly debatable. But the left is just as guilty of politicizing, if you're so concerned about the Russians under Trump why turn a blind eye when it happened before him. If it happened during the election it happened in Obama’s watch, right? Didn’t Obama state the elections were tamper proof?

But people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones, something like that..... the US is just as guilty if not more so in meddling it other countries elections.

Where’s the outcry there?

Trump won because the DNC/Hillary thought they had it in the bag and over looked alot of blue collar working voters in their so called “Blue Wall”. Only they forgot to ask them, think about or legislate for them, hence when the opponent shows up..... well, the left is still in denial.
 
But people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones, something like that..... the US is just as guilty if not more so in meddling it other countries elections.

Where’s the outcry there?
Ah, the moral high ground. Maybe you should set an example and leave the US, in good conscience.
 
Ah, the moral high ground. Maybe you should set an example and leave the US, in good conscience.

I’m born, bred and bled tax paying American, how about you? Thought you’re Canadian ey? Why not have the courtesy to keep you’re nose out of others business?

There’s alot of foreign people posting here about the USA should do this or that, isnt that what the Russians were doing?
 
There’s alot of foreign people posting here about the USA should do this or that, isnt that what the Russians were doing?
You seem to be okay with it:
But people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones, something like that..... the US is just as guilty if not more so in meddling it other countries elections.

Where’s the outcry there?
 
I’m born, bred and bled tax paying American, how about you? Thought you’re Canadian ey? Why not have the courtesy to keep you’re nose out of others business?

There’s alot of foreign people posting here about the USA should do this or that, isnt that what the Russians were doing?

Shut up Moscow Mitch... Fred pwned you, now get the fuck of this thread
 
https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-analyst-trump-locking-down-intelligence-community-1451620

Mary Anne Marsh, a political analyst for Fox News, raised concerns on Monday that President Donald Trump appeared to be consolidating his control over the U.S. intelligence community with the nomination of GOP Representative John Ratcliffe to replace Dan Coats as director of national intelligence.

"It's more about protecting Trump than America," Marsh, who previously served as a senior adviser to Democratic Senator John Kerry, warned during a segment of Fox News' America's Newsroom on Monday. "John Ratcliffe has been all over the investigate the investigators [probe], who's doing that right now? [Attorney General] Bill Barr, so Donald Trump has consolidated his control over the intelligence committees at a time when he's given Barr unprecedented access and control over all the intelligence information, which we've never seen by an attorney general before," she said.

"Now he adds Ratcliffe," the analyst asserted. "So this is Trump locking down the intelligence community for his purposes, not national security purposes."


Trump reportedly long aimed to replace Coats, a Republican, as he did not see him as loyal enough to his administration. On Sunday, the president announced that Coats would be leaving office on August 15 and that he had nominated Ratcliffe, who represents Texas, as his replacement.

"I am pleased to announce that highly respected Congressman John Ratcliffe of Texas will be nominated by me to be the Director of National Intelligence. A former U.S. Attorney, John will lead and inspire greatness for the Country he loves," the president wrote in a tweet.

Republican Senator Richard Burr, who represents North Carolina and is the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, suggested in a Monday statement that Ratcliffe's nomination would quickly be approved by his committee. "When the White House submits its official nomination to the Senate Intelligence Committee, we will work to move it swiftly through regular order," Burr said, NPR reported.

Some experts have raised concerns about Ratcliffe's lack of experience when it comes to national intelligence. "Ratcliffe would be the first DNI without significant intelligence or ambassadorial experience," John McLaughlin, a former Deputy Director of the CIA, pointed out on Twitter. "Dan Coats has done superbly the main thing a DNI must do: present the collective view of the intelligence community in a fair, objective, and non-partisan way."

As Marsh explained, Ratcliffe has been a staunch supporter of the president, particularly in the wake of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference and its alleged involvement with the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election.

"So Americans need to know this, as they listen to the Democrats and socialists on the other side of the aisle, as they do dramatic readings from this report: that Volume 2 of this report was not authorized under the law to be written. It was written to a legal standard that does not exist at the Justice Department," he argued during Mueller's testimony to the House Judiciary and House Intelligence Committees last week. "And it was written in violation of every DOJ [Department of Justice] principle about extra-prosecutorial commentary," the congressman said.

As Democratic lawmakers continue to investigate allegations against Trump and his administration, as well as push for legislation to challenge Russian election interference, Ratcliffe would serve in a prominent role that he could potentially use to shield the president.

Does this mean that Trump and his 2020 campaign will not be spied on under false pretenses?
 
Back
Top