Again, i understand it is a tactic for you to puff each response up with scolding like an old schoolmarm, going on and on about conservatives and what not.
I don't give a fuck about strategy to have a tactic against your ilk, you use tactics when you respect your opponent, I have no respect for your brain dead cult.
Let's get to the meat of the lie you recently told about me.
I asked you to show where i've ever said C. Page was part of Trump's campaign.
You can't show it, so you move on and change the subject:
Again, you don't seem to understand your own posts
This is what you wrote
Watergate was about spying on political opponents. If you need to buy a book on it, you might be spying on a political opponent...if potus wants to know what you're doing. The Russia investigation, at that time, was revolving around the dossier. So yah, this text connects potus to spying on political opponent...enough to open a full fledged investigaion.
This is how I replied
Except there is no evidence of this spying.
DOJ: No evidence Trump Tower was wiretapped | Fox News
If you are talking about the FBI obtaining a FISA warrant for a 'advisor to the staff of Kremlin' who in October 2016 was not part of Trump's campaign then it's their fucking job to spy on Russian spies.
Read some facts, before spreading lies and propaganda.
Your complaint is that Democrats called the cops.
And the Australian diplomat called the cops.
The Trump crew did not.
Law and Order Party right?
Notice the IF?
There are only TWO instances of the right wing making up this lie about 'political spying'
One is the wiretap claim and another is the Page claim.
I referenced to them both. There is no other 'evidence' to speak of. Feel free to mention anything else that is specific if you can.
Hope your dead right wing brain gets it now.
So you made an inference, and tried to force it down my throat.
If I was trying to force it down your throat, would I be using IFs?
Whether or not C. Page was ever part of Trump's campaign (I also have not said he was NOT part of the campaign), Page was used as a cardboard cut-out to get a backdoor into Trump's campaign...to spy on Trump. Could have been anybody. Could have been Hope Hicks. They chose to USE Page, spread disinformation about Page to get at Trump. They never had enough on Page to get a FISA, so they boosted their next application with the dossier. Therefore, the "Russia" (Page) investigation revolved around the dossier, without which they would not have applied AGAIN, and without which they would not have gotten the warrant. They did not limit the wire-taps to just Page, who, as you say, left (whatever position he had) when the press started to smear him.
Let me get this straight.
Trump VOLUNTARILY hires Page (and Manafort, another Russian stooge and Gates) but the FBI was using him as a backdoor?
So it's the FBI's fault that a guy who openly bragged about working for Russia got hired by Trump's campaign?
If this was Clintons, you would be arguing the opposite, instead of blaming the cops who caught the thieves.
I can't speak for Nunes, but you do, and I don't trust anything you say about Nunes.
You cannot separate extraneous factors, such as, who broke into the DNC server, and the dossier, which was in FULL PLAY by the time L. Page's text came out, saying "potus wants to know everything we are doing".
The texts indicate there was a connection between these agents, the chain of command, and potus, while the Trump dossier was in FULL PLAY (translation: the investigation revolved around it like it was an "insurance policy").
A 'connection' that you made up. A connection that got busted by the WSJ.
it's the job of the POTUS to track hostile actions by a foreign country, just because your side is full of traitors and Russian stooges, it doesn't make the FBI or the POTUS guilty.
