Fox Lies: Obama Text from FBI Agent Hyped by Fox News Was Not About Clinton Probe WSJ reports

So if you’ve been plugged into the news today, you may have seen the news of more Peter StrzokLisa Page texts being released. The text getting the most attention is the one reading, “potus wants to know everything we’re doing,” referring to then-President Barack Obama.

Fox News’ report this morning noted, “According to a newly released Senate report, this text raises questions about Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.”

This is the text exchange in question:

strzok-page-texts-650x224.jpg


The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and Chairman Ron Johnson released all the texts along with the committee’s report this morning, which had this to say about that particular exchange:

On September 2, 2016, Page wrote about preparing talking points for [FBI] Director [James] Comey because “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.” This text raises additional questions about the type and extent of President Obama’s personal involvement in the [Hillary] Clinton email scandal and the FBI investigation of it.

There is a footnote to this part that says “The Justice Department notified the Committee that it had redacted other text messages that were personal in nature or relating to other investigations. See Jan. 19th Boyd letter, supra note 5. Presumably, because this message was not redacted, the Department believes it may relate to the FBI’s investigation of classified information on Secretary Clinton’s private server.”

Naturally, there was a lot of coverage of this particular text today on Fox. Congressman Louis Gohmert concluded on Fox & Friends “it means the President wants to know what they’re doing to try to stop Trump.” Brian Kilmeade said the messages raise questions about what Obama knew about the Clinton investigation.

Earlier tonight on The Five, as they led with this report, Dana Perinocautioned, “It could look terrible or it could be he has seeking a briefing about the Russian involvement and meddling in the election. From these text messages, we don’t know that.”

That came shortly after Kimberly Guilfoyle reiterated the same point about how it raises questions about what Obama knew in the Clinton investigation and when:



Well, per The Wall Street Journal:

Text messages from 2016 show preparation to brief Barack Obama about Russia’s interference in that year’s election, according to associates of the FBI employees involved in the exchange, not, as a Republican senator suggested, meddling by the then-president in the federal Hillary Clinton email investigation…

[A]ssociates of Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page said that exchange referred to the president’s wanting information on Russia election meddling, which the FBI was heavily involved in over that period. That exchange occurred just days before Mr. Obama met Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit in China. Mr. Obama said in December 2016 that he had addressed the issue of tampering with the election process with Mr. Putin at that September meeting.

Senator Johnson recently came under fire after hyping that “secret society” text after it came out and pretty much everyone recognized it as sarcasm.


https://www.mediaite.com/online/oba...-news-reportedly-was-not-about-clinton-probe/
 
Is any more proof needed that Fox News is propaganda? That right wing lies all day, giddying up their poorly educated wretches into frenzy making up their own reality. Fox will spend less than 5 seconds on issuing a correction if at all they do it and the cult will continue to believe the lie.

But but but you cannot dislike the Trump world for this kind of pervasive dishonesty. That's TDS!
 
wow. I would have thought Obama kept himself out of this.
Page purchased all the presidents men to brush up on watergate.

that is crazy.



Nunes has seen much, much more than he can talk about.

In addition- and this is big but we don't have detail yet- the committee has been working for months on further investigation of the state department and their tag team relationship with the fbi in this unmasking/dossier/cover for Hillary routine- and I guess I don't need to say on a day like today- all of that happened with Obama's (I will be generous here) cooperation. Including his role in assuring that it would be leaked by lowering the security classification on it a a final dump on the way out so that the media would learn that trump people were under investigation.

If I had to take a guess, when you heard him refer to "future memos" he was referring to the state department related memo coming out on Friday. Altogether, there are three memos planned. One is on the fbi and is out. The next one is the state department one. Coming soon. After that, and a bit further down the road, he plans to release another memo that ties the first two together and does and analysis of the collusion between all the parties and agencies, white house included. My understanding anyway.

It's hard to keep up with but it is great to see some movement.


I am not able to break away and catch up on the news until later in the day.

But I imagine that as a result of this latest Page text, CNN and MSNBC are on fire calling for Obama to be investigated for obstruction of justice for attempting to meddle in the Hillary investigation.

I will check later.

:cool:

"Yup. already underway too. should be a lot of things to report about the time Mueller thinks he owns the stage when it comes time for his report and legal actions right before the elections. Same with the fbi investigation. Mueller will be sharing the stage for a while. He will continue to be the star of the show, but not the only one. Especially after this week when Obama's name starts surfacing on a daily basis in regard to his role in "matters." Think you have heard the last of Susan Rice and the State Department? Think again. It's going to be non-stop"




Okay tards. I am shamelessly quoting myself from yesterday or the day before.

Out of my usual generosity of spirit I tried to ease you into the coming reality.

No need to thank me.

New Strzok-Page texts: Obama wanted “to know everything,” but … Update: “I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations”

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/02/07/new-strzok-page-texts-obama-wanted-know-everything/

Speaking of corruption -- if anyone wants to get into the weeds, the Grassley/Graham referral memo pretty much confirms the Nunes memo and destroys the media talking of points of Alfred E. Neuman's less intelligent twin brother, Adam Schiff.

Here's a link:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-02-06 CEG LG to DOJ FBI (Unclassified Steele Referral).pdf


.
Tick, Tick, Tick...FBI Scandal Getting Closer to Obama


Tick, tick, tick… we’re getting closer and closer to the “What did the president know and when did he know it?” moment in the biggest political scandal in American history. What looks like a sitting president authorizing the use of the vast spy apparatus of the federal government on the opposing party candidate for president would, if proven, be far bigger than Watergate – a mere burglary intended to spy on the opposition. Pay attention because you may want to tell your children or grandchildren what it was like watching this all unfold in 2018.

Up until the present moment, Barack Obama has been missing in all the discussions of surveillance misbehavior. And most curiously, Obama has been almost invisible, staying quiet, and not using his expensive Washington, DC mansion (shared with Valeire Jarrett) as a base for leading the opposition to President Trump, as many of us expected him to do. He is the only president I can remember who didn’t get out of DC when his term in office expired, yet he has been as invisible as if he were Truman retired to Independence or Eisenhower retired to Gettysburg. He hasn’t even spoken out about the opposition to his presidential monument planned for public park land in Chicago, My optimistic guess is that he realizes his peril and is dummying up.

Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...otus_wants_to_know_everything_were_doing.html


His ability to lie is bigly better than Trump's ability.
there is no comparison. His lies are more important and he does it better.
He might be better than Bill Clinton.
That was so well done... its crazy.
He might have been a psychopath on this and the keep your doctor stuff.

A good manager spot checks his employees, ensuring things are being done as requested.

This is what we are talking about - this is how braindead conservatism looks like.
 
you cheap shot artist troll.


1. My second statement that you included in your out of context cut and past referenced Obama saying that Hillary would not get special treatment. He was asked multiple times... and he lied about it.

Hillary and her team got a Headquarters special.

So what the hell you are doing grouping that quote in with your out of context crap.

2. and my first quote would not have mattered which investigation you are talking about. Page did purchase all the presidents men to brush up on watergate...

3. and its not like this is the omega of rebuttals... there is still a ton of wiggle room in here.

"Text messages from 2016 show preparation to brief Barack Obama about Russia’s interference in that year’s election, according to associates of the FBI employees involved in the exchange, not, as a Republican senator suggested, meddling by the then-president in the federal Hillary Clinton email investigation…"
 
you cheap shot artist troll.


My second statement that you included in your out of context cut and past referenced Obama saying that Hillary would not get special treatment. He was asked multiple times... and he lied about it.

Hillary and her team got a Headquarters special.

So what the hell you are doing grouping that quote in with your out of context crap.

and my first quote would not have mattered which investigation you are talking about. Page did purchase all the presidents men to brush up on watergate...

First, I quoted you in FULL, I didn't edit anything, so what the heck are you babbling about out of context, you moron. Am I supposed to write commentary before quoting you, imagining some mythical context?

Second, you calling it WATERGATE had NOTHING to do with Clinton getting special treatment - another claim that you have no proof for. In fact, she got the worst treatment, a pointless email investigation cost her the election when Republican FBI director went on a tirade against her.

Stop lying and stop calling others liars just because you got caught again.

Your side lies and lies and lies all day, you called it watergate without knowing any facts, now you have to live with that embarrassment.
 
Watergate was about spying on political opponents. If you need to buy a book on it, you might be spying on a political opponent...if potus wants to know what you're doing. The Russia investigation, at that time, was revolving around the dossier. So yah, this text connects potus to spying on political opponent...enough to open a full fledged investigaion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jem
Page wrote... that she was buying All the Presidents Men to Brush up on Watergate.
I did not call it watergate in this thread you dope... she associated this with watergate you fricken troll.



don't quote me out of context... again.
I am tired of your cheap shot shit.
show some integrity instead of ruining this board everyday.


First, I quoted you in FULL, I didn't edit anything, so what the heck are you babbling about out of context, you moron. Am I supposed to write commentary before quoting you, imagining some mythical context?

Second, you calling it WATERGATE had NOTHING to do with Clinton getting special treatment - another claim that you have no proof for. In fact, she got the worst treatment, a pointless email investigation cost her the election when Republican FBI director went on a tirade against her.

Stop lying and stop calling others liars just because you got caught again.

Your side lies and lies and lies all day, you called it watergate without knowing any facts, now you have to live with that embarrassment.
 
Watergate was about spying on political opponents. If you need to buy a book on it, you might be spying on a political opponent...if potus wants to know what you're doing. The Russia investigation, at that time, was revolving around the dossier. So yah, this text connects potus to spying on political opponent...enough to open a full fledged investigaion.

Except there is no evidence of this spying.

DOJ: No evidence Trump Tower was wiretapped | Fox News

If you are talking about the FBI obtaining a FISA warrant for a 'advisor to the staff of Kremlin' who in October 2016 was not part of Trump's campaign then it's their fucking job to spy on Russian spies.

Read some facts, before spreading lies and propaganda.

Your complaint is that Democrats called the cops.
And the Australian diplomat called the cops.
The Trump crew did not.

Law and Order Party right?
 
Page wrote... that she was buying All the Presidents Men to Brush up on Watergate.
dope...

don't quote me out of context... again.
I am tired of you cheap shot shit.

And good1 just explained it to you... which is what page must have been thinking.

And? Who gives a shit?

Good1 lied again, Carter Page was not part of Trump's campaign in October 2016, he had resigned a month earlier, not forgetting that he bragged about being advisor to the Kremlin prior to that. He is guilty as fuck and he is going down.

I am tired of explaining basic facts to you people and getting insulted for showing you the truth.

You got this story completely ass backwards but you are trying to pretend that it's still true.
 
Except there is no evidence of this spying.

DOJ: No evidence Trump Tower was wiretapped | Fox News

If you are talking about the FBI obtaining a FISA warrant for a 'advisor to the staff of Kremlin' who in October 2016 was not part of Trump's campaign then it's their fucking job to spy on Russian spies.

Read some facts, before spreading lies and propaganda.

Your complaint is that Democrats called the cops.
And the Australian diplomat called the cops.
The Trump crew did not.

Law and Order Party right?
The texts are evidence...enough evidence to open a full fledged investigation by yet another special council.

Why do you disagree, while still trying to float the Popadopulus/Page canard?
 
Back
Top