Fox Lies: Obama Text from FBI Agent Hyped by Fox News Was Not About Clinton Probe WSJ reports

So if you’ve been plugged into the news today, you may have seen the news of more Peter StrzokLisa Page texts being released. The text getting the most attention is the one reading, “potus wants to know everything we’re doing,” referring to then-President Barack Obama.

Fox News’ report this morning noted, “According to a newly released Senate report, this text raises questions about Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.”

This is the text exchange in question:

strzok-page-texts-650x224.jpg


The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and Chairman Ron Johnson released all the texts along with the committee’s report this morning, which had this to say about that particular exchange:

On September 2, 2016, Page wrote about preparing talking points for [FBI] Director [James] Comey because “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.” This text raises additional questions about the type and extent of President Obama’s personal involvement in the [Hillary] Clinton email scandal and the FBI investigation of it.

There is a footnote to this part that says “The Justice Department notified the Committee that it had redacted other text messages that were personal in nature or relating to other investigations. See Jan. 19th Boyd letter, supra note 5. Presumably, because this message was not redacted, the Department believes it may relate to the FBI’s investigation of classified information on Secretary Clinton’s private server.”

Naturally, there was a lot of coverage of this particular text today on Fox. Congressman Louis Gohmert concluded on Fox & Friends “it means the President wants to know what they’re doing to try to stop Trump.” Brian Kilmeade said the messages raise questions about what Obama knew about the Clinton investigation.

Earlier tonight on The Five, as they led with this report, Dana Perinocautioned, “It could look terrible or it could be he has seeking a briefing about the Russian involvement and meddling in the election. From these text messages, we don’t know that.”

That came shortly after Kimberly Guilfoyle reiterated the same point about how it raises questions about what Obama knew in the Clinton investigation and when:



Well, per The Wall Street Journal:

Text messages from 2016 show preparation to brief Barack Obama about Russia’s interference in that year’s election, according to associates of the FBI employees involved in the exchange, not, as a Republican senator suggested, meddling by the then-president in the federal Hillary Clinton email investigation…

[A]ssociates of Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page said that exchange referred to the president’s wanting information on Russia election meddling, which the FBI was heavily involved in over that period. That exchange occurred just days before Mr. Obama met Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit in China. Mr. Obama said in December 2016 that he had addressed the issue of tampering with the election process with Mr. Putin at that September meeting.

Senator Johnson recently came under fire after hyping that “secret society” text after it came out and pretty much everyone recognized it as sarcasm.


https://www.mediaite.com/online/oba...-news-reportedly-was-not-about-clinton-probe/
Again, I am saying that your headline is a lie. That you created this fake news title.

Below is from the article you posted:

https://www.mediaite.com/online/oba...-news-reportedly-was-not-about-clinton-probe/

Earlier tonight on The Five, as they led with this report, Dana Perinocautioned, “It could look terrible or it could be he has seeking a briefing about the Russian involvement and meddling in the election. From these text messages, we don’t know that.”

That came shortly after Kimberly Guilfoyle reiterated the same point about how it raises questions about what Obama knew in the Clinton investigation and when
 
Can you read.

That quote does not state what you claim.

It simply states that the text raises questions.

Is raising questions and making a definitive statement that the text are about the Clinton probe really the same thing to you?



Waiting for the statement that the text are regarding the probe.

Can you bother to click on the article?

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., along with majority staff from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, is releasing the texts, along with a report titled, “The Clinton Email Scandal and the FBI's Investigation of it.”

What is the relevance of these 'Obama texts' and these 'questions' if it doesn't match the title of the report?
 
Again, I am saying that your headline is a lie. That you created this fake news title.

Below is from the article you posted:

https://www.mediaite.com/online/oba...-news-reportedly-was-not-about-clinton-probe/

Earlier tonight on The Five, as they led with this report, Dana Perinocautioned, “It could look terrible or it could be he has seeking a briefing about the Russian involvement and meddling in the election. From these text messages, we don’t know that.”

That came shortly after Kimberly Guilfoyle reiterated the same point about how it raises questions about what Obama knew in the Clinton investigation and when

Yes, Fox is continuing their fake news talking point, thanks for posting.
 
Can you bother to click on the article?

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., along with majority staff from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, is releasing the texts, along with a report titled, “The Clinton Email Scandal and the FBI's Investigation of it.”

What is the relevance of these 'Obama texts' and these 'questions' if it doesn't match the title of the report?
Okay, simply asking you to backup your lie. You posted a link to several articles in which I have not seen Fox News state that the text are about the Clinton probe. I posted some quotes from Fox News correspondents from the article that you posted.
 
Bullshit, the whole thing is a month apart

Page wasn't even on Trump's campaign at the time, let alone 'spying' on Trump. A Russian stooge getting spied on OUTSIDE of even the campaign doesn't equate to Trump being spied on at all.

Here's where you are having a logic problem, causing you to lie.

I'm not talking about what Obama said a month before L. Page said, "potus wants to know everything we are doing".

Talking about what L. Page was doing at that time she texted it.

At that time, they were executing a warrant to eavesdrop on Trump. Carter Page is incidental because the Trump dossier is ABOUT TRUMP, not Carter Page. Why would they confine their spying to just Carter Page if they think Trump is compromised by Russians? If Carter Page is involved at all, it's to USE him as a backdoor to the Trump campaign. That wasn't working so they took a direct shot at Trump via the famous "Trump dossier" (not the Carter dossier that you've never heard about).

So you are floating a red herring with this whole Carter Page angle. The Nunes memo shows they were going after Trump, a political opponent, with this dossier. Now we find out "potus wants to know everything we are doing".
 
Last edited:
Okay, simply asking you to backup your lie. You posted a link to several articles in which I have not seen Fox News state that the text are about the Clinton probe. I posted some quotes from Fox News correspondents from the article that you posted.

Jesus Christ.

The Senate 'report' is titled 'Clinton email scandal', and you are bothering me with this nonsense about it being not related to the Clinton probe. If you simply do word search about 'Clinton' on the Fox News article, you would get 7 hits but this is not about the Clinton probe?

WTF
 
Jesus Christ.

The Senate 'report' is titled 'Clinton email scandal', and you are bothering me with this nonsense about it being not related to the Clinton probe. If you simply do word search about 'Clinton' on the Fox News article, you would get 7 hits but this is not about the Clinton probe?

WTF
So, do you have the proof or not?

Are you ready to admit that your title is a lie?

You posted a link to 3 fucking articles. Not one of them have Fox stating that the text were about the Clinton probe.
 
What the fuck are you talking about?

The quotes in post show that the title of thread is a lie. That you lied.

Another philistine with zero ability to read

From Fox News article

"The newly uncovered texts reveal a bit more about the timing of the discovery of "hundreds of thousands" of emails on former Congressman Anthony Weiner's laptop, ultimately leading to Comey's infamous letter to Congress just days before the 2016 presidential election."

Where they asking questions then?

Where is the question?

Show me the question and the question mark if you were going to pretend that they were just asking questions.

They are making a DECLARATIVE statement.

The only liar here is you and your cult who are desperate to prove that your favorite news source is not lying.
 
So, do you have the proof or not?

Are you ready to admit that your title is a lie?


Please tell me the 'questions' part in this statement made by Fox and I would admit the lie

The newly uncovered texts reveal a bit more about the timing of the discovery of "hundreds of thousands" of emails on former Congressman Anthony Weiner's laptop, ultimately leading to Comey's infamous letter to Congress just days before the 2016 presidential election.

WHICH IS THE QUESTION PART? IS THAT HOW YOU ASK A QUESTION?

Do answer, don't run away from the thread now.
 
Back
Top