Quote from Max E. Pad:
I find it hilarious how Liberals get frothing angry when Fox News is mentioned.
Lets see, they control the schools, the universities, hollywood, the music industry and the mainstream media, yet they get they become uncontrollably angry at the 1 channel that conservatives control.
Quote from Free Thinker:
fair and balanced?
Roger Ailes: Fox News Is On A 'Course Correction' Away From Far Right
Fox News CEO Roger Ailes has given one of his typically candid interviews to Newsweek. The interview was published Monday.
For a man who first made his name as a media guru for Richard Nixon, Ailes is often surprisingly forthcoming about Fox News and his opinions. In previous interviews, he has called NPR executives "Nazis" (he later apologized), said he didn't mind if people thought Glenn Beck was fired from the channel, and admitted that he wants both Bill and Hillary Clinton to join Fox News.
Behind the scenes, Ailes is reported to have clashed with Sarah Palin and told Beck to cool his more controversial rhetoric.
Monday's interview offered up more of Ailes' unvarnished opinions about his network and his employees. He made a big admission to Newsweek, saying that he has made a "course correction" at Fox News, veering it away from the hard-right line it took in the earlier days of the Obama administration. (Ailes offered a preview of this strategy in January, when he told Russell Simmons that he had ordered his anchors and pundits to "tone it down" in the wake of the Gabrielle Giffords shooting.) Beck's departure, as well as a more nuanced approach to his most famous pundit, Sarah Palin, have been part of that strategy, Ailes said.
He also spoke openly about many of his anchors, saying that Bill O'Reilly "hates" Sean Hannity because he's jealous of his radio success (and thus confirming years of rumors about the animosity between the two).
Ailes also called Hannity "predictable" and said that he sometimes has to have a word with Shepard Smith when Smith says things that may not go over well with the Fox News crowd. (He didn't say whether he was referring to Smith's seemingly pro-union comments about the Wisconsin protests, or his saying that the killing of Osama bin Laden was illegal and that American foreign policy is on a dangerous path.)
Read the full interview, including news about Tim Pawlenty, Mitt Romney and Rick Perry's relationship with Ailes,
Quote from Free Thinker:
hey tampon boy. what part of the meaning of"fair and balanced" dont you understand?
just pointing out the hypocrisy of fox news. thinking people have known all along that fox is selling an agenda but there are actually people dumb enough to believe fox is balanced.Quote from Max E. Pad:
Ahhhh i see, so its really just the slogan that gets your panties in a twist?
So if they were just to stop with the slogan "Fair and Balanced" all of a sudden media matters would cease to exist, and the rest of you liberal cry babies would stop bitching about fox news right?
Quote from Max E. Pad:
Ahhhh i see, so its really just the slogan that gets your panties in a twist?
So if they were just to stop with the slogan "Fair and Balanced" all of a sudden media matters would cease to exist, and the rest of you liberal cry babies would stop bitching about fox news right?
Quote from Free Thinker:
just pointing out the hypocrisy of fox news. thinking people have known all along that fox is selling an agenda but there are actually people dumb enough to believe fox is balanced.
"Fox has nothing to be embarrassed about. It is the most centrist news channel "
Quote from Maverick74:
We have debated this on here endlessly. Fox defends their motto by the fact that almost all their shows have BOTH a liberal and conservative point of view in each segment. Where as MSNBC is one big circle jerk of 8 liberal guests and not a single person who might possibly present the other point of view. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Quote from Maverick74:
We have debated this on here endlessly. Fox defends their motto by the fact that almost all their shows have BOTH a liberal and conservative point of view in each segment. Where as MSNBC is one big circle jerk of 8 liberal guests and not a single person who might possibly present the other point of view. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Quote from tradingjournals:
An example of the other point of view (heading to Iraq war): Iraq has WMDs, and the brits have a dossier of evidence that Saddam has will attack with WMDS in one hour or less. I bet they knew they were lies (particularly the UK claim). The talking heads were spinning it shamelessly.
The retardicans are retardicans.