What a lively thread. Let's do it again for the June expiration shall we?
That's only 7 trading sessions away. I am getting the sense we will not go negative again, because of the re-openings going on in the USA now.
What a lively thread. Let's do it again for the June expiration shall we?
I think TWS and the back end could handle negative prices. It would seem the boolean flag had not been enabled for the oil contracts.
No software update was required in TWS to handle negative prices the next day.
Accordingly, our Mr. Shah, who just couldn't resist buying 212 contracts, was charged margin at $30 a pop. I am sure Mr. Shah didn't think for a moment how the fuck his $77k account is carrying 212 CL contracts rofl
![]()
The more I read this thread, the more I think that all futures traders should run as fast as they can from IB. WTF?
similarly IB should run as fast as they can from such trader.
that trader that caused huge loss was too inexperienced.
Good point. I never considered that. However, when I think about it, discount brokers need fresh blood like Shah; hence, it's not in their nature to run away from traders like that, when they should.
IB made clean their clients' losses. If the clients were dealing with a typical spread betting firm, they will be bankrupt for sure.
I also put a lot of the blame on CME for not having any serious circuit breakers.
ES falls 20% and trading has to stop for the rest of the day.
CL falls over 100% and trading just continues as if its acompletely normal and expected thing.