Forums page, Chit Chat warning!!!

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
I am a horrible speller

Yes, you are. You're apparently a bad grammatician too.

btw, Z... I read on another thread that you posted here on ET with the information that you are an alcoholic. Is that true? Are you attending AA meetings at this time?

Also, I had asked you on another thread whether you have ever been banned from ET, and/or if you have posted here under any other user names? I have never been banned, nor have I had another user name.

Thanks for your prompt reply. I have to check out for a while but I will be back this afternoon.

Bye for now.
 
LMAO:

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=981950>

p.s. If you can find a link to where I claim to be an alcoholic, I would like to see it....


Quote from traderNik:

Yes, you are. You're apparently a bad grammatician too.

btw, Z... I read on another thread that you posted here on ET with the information that you are an alcoholic. Is that true? Are you attending AA meetings at this time?

Also, I had asked you on another thread whether you have ever been banned from ET, and/or if you have posted here under any other user names? I have never been banned, nor have I had another user name.

Thanks for your prompt reply. I have to check out for a while but I will be back this afternoon.

Bye for now.
 

Attachments

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

I am a horrible speller, I sometimes forget to use the spellcheck.

It is not like I am claiming to be, or to have been a proof reader....

Bwaaahaahaaahaahahaaaa

Oops!!

You forgot to mention whether you are sticking with you statement that the data in that chart were from 2003 and not 2005? I am very eager to hear this. And no, saying

"There was data from 2003 in the chart and that's what I was referring to'

will not cut it, unfortunately. A review of the thread shows that.

Oops!!
 
Hey Z - want to see something you might learn from?

Watch this.

I was wrong.

Oxford shows the correct form as 'grammarian'. I am sure that I have seen grammatician used somewhere before and apparently some do use it but I will go with Oxford.

Sorry for mocking your spelling.
 
I accept your apology, no problemo.

:D

Quote from traderNik:

Hey Z - want to see something you might learn from?

Watch this.

I was wrong.

Oxford shows the correct form as 'grammarian'. I am sure that I have seen grammatician used somewhere before and apparently some do use it but I will go with Oxford.

Sorry for mocking your spelling.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

I accept your apology, no problemo.

:D

Good.. now back to the questions at hand.

1) Did you ever post on this site under a different user name and/or have you ever been banned?

2) Do you continue to claim that the chart in the thread cited by RM was designed to highlight 2003 data?

3) Have you ever posted on ET to the effect that you are an alcoholic?

4) Do you continue to claim that the phrase 'goose-stepping' does not evoke images of Nazi Germany?

5) Are you willing to rebut the challenges to your assertions made by Pabst in the last thread you started (I know, it must be hard to keep track - I mean the one that started with that pseudo-scientific analysis of the personality traits of conservatives)?

We await your answers.
 
Spain is still looking for a head inquisitor....

Quote from traderNik:

Good.. now back to the questions at hand.

1) Did you ever post on this site under a different user name and/or have you ever been banned?

2) Do you continue to claim that the chart in the thread cited by RM was designed to highlight 2003 data?

3) Have you ever posted on ET to the effect that you are an alcoholic?

4) Do you continue to claim that the phrase 'goose-stepping' does not evoke images of Nazi Germany?

5) Are you willing to rebut the challenges to your assertions made by Pabst in the last thread you started (I know, it must be hard to keep track - I mean the one that started with that pseudo-scientific analysis of the personality traits of conservatives)?

We await your answers.
 
Back
Top