fortes fortuna juvat

Status
Not open for further replies.
svrz said:
I believe he is attempting to duplicate what you have and what Jack had created here:

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/fortes-fortuna-juvat.282311/page-10#post-4446063



There is nothing wrong with it. It is just that Jack introduced a completely different framework that was predominantly based on volume only. We want to understand it better.



Programming is not the difficult aspect of this pursuit. Understanding the logic may very well be.
There are volume labels on Jack's chart such as P1,P2,P3,T1 and T2 which each of their exact definitions remains somewhat unclear.
More...

Look like we can team up in this endeavor.

I remember somebody tried to explain to me what P1, P2, P3, T1 and T2 means but I can't find it. It's may be on TL.
 
baro-san said:
If my memory serves me:

P = peak
T = trouth
1 = 1st
2 = 2nd
3 = 3rd

A regular sequence is P1, T1, P2, T2, P3. But stuff happens, sorted by the relation between the Ps, as well as between Ts, amplitudes.
More...

Cool. Thanks.

Are you willing to team up?
 
stepan7 said:
Thank you for the post.

What are you talking about I called JHM version 1.0 using Channels/PRV/Formations/FBO/FTT perfected by Spydertrader. You much modified and improve it for your needs, of course - great work.

There was JHM version 0.0 with MACD, two Stochastics, Rockets and so on, started back in the days even ET not existed.

What I am talking about implementing Jack's late annotation/logic (let's call it JHM version 2.0) that aren't uses any channels (at least I don't see them on Jack's charts) but other acronyms XB, XR, etc.

Basically question is - is it worth/helpful to try to automate Jack's annotation.

In JHM 0.0 and JHM 1.0 there are clear rules when to enter and exit the trade.

Can somebody come up with such rules for JHM 2.0?

If so, I will do programming stuff, time permit.

St.
More...

The link for the stuff you posted i think you better ask this guy:

llIHeroic

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/fractal-theory-redux.303677/

If it`s worth to spend time coding, i can`t tell.I think i saw him posting lots of images with the same stuff as depicted in your image.I have no idea what it does exactly.
 
svrz said:
Jack's 'Exact Science' efforts attempted to rectify the problems of PV but its complications may have created much confusion.
More...

No confusion at all.The rules are pretty straightforward and can be coded by a mediocre programmer.


svrz said:
Who is Tomahawks? Is he/she using Jack's framework?
More...

The Tomahawks missiles.I think i read somewhere it`s programmed in C#.I maybe mistaken though.
 
fordewind said:
No confusion at all.The rules are pretty straightforward and can be coded by a mediocre programmer.
More...

Good to know. I have not reviewed the material since 2013. I will have to read the 'Exact Science' thread once again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top