I fully concur with your sentiment. Perhaps what we should do is to derive or recreate this framework from the fundamental concepts. Yes, this is the proverbial reinvention of the wheel. However through this process, we will be able to fully comprehend the operational details of the market, compare it with Jack's work and create a robust application of them.
We have so many descriptors such as dominant, non-dominant, volume slope, pace acceleration, symmetrical pennant break out, lateral formation break out, lateral movement break out, etc. This is not to mention all the acronyms that Jack introduced. However we lack a map detailing the relationship between each of these terms. Perhaps Jack believed he achieved such a feat with JHM 2.0 but I'm not confident that it is complete or feasible for implementing a trading model even if it is.
I have often thought of creating a Finite State Machine (FSM) using all the above concepts but have been invariably distracted by this or that.

It is possible that Jack was on the same path with all the pseudo flow charts that he created but unfortunately I found most of them very difficult to comprehend.