So it is not false. It is unproven -- which means that they don't know if it is true or not.
So it is not false. It is unproven -- which means that they don't know if it is true or not.
That's the dumbest fucking argumentSo it is not false. It is unproven -- which means that they don't know if it is true or not.
That's the dumbest fucking argument
So it is not false. It is unproven -- which means that they don't know if it is true or not.
If Snopes has evidence that it is false then they state directly it is false.
Unproven simply means it is unproven to be either true or false.
I will fucking pay for you to do a course on logical fallacies at this stage.
It gets worse..
Try this on for logic
Unproven does not equal false
For goodness sake man, you have a nearly average intelligence brain, use it.
View attachment 237721
Russell's teapot is an analogy, formulated by the philosopher Bertrand Russell, to illustrate that the philosophic burden of proof lies upon a person making unfalsifiable claims, rather than shifting the burden of disproof to others. Russell specifically applied his analogy in the context of religion.Wikipedia