Because they don't go on political fishing expeditions.
This case does seems stupid to be honest. They raise 25 mill and use a couple hundred
grand for personal expenses. (Its not even 1% lol)
Look at any fundraising org and nobody uses 100% of funds raised on the actual cause. Nobody.
I bet this goes nowhere, simple fine for misleading statements about 100% funds
go to wall. Every fundraising operation has a 1-10% administrative expense.
And the timing is funny isnt it? It always is.
If crimes were committed then how are they fishing expeditions? Its an either or situation, you are the one saying corruption happened and then say its speculative, pick a lane.
Also why is timing funny? It came too early in fact, should hve been used later if it was political.
