Quote from ricter:
The real problem is not being able to borrow for war. If the other guy can, and you can't, you're dead. This is why the debt ceiling amendment to the Constitution idea must die (and follow the gold standard to the ash heap of history).
True. But what if you don't
HAVE to borrow. If you don't have to borrow, there's no debt ... there's no
interest to pay. There are governments today whose interest payments alone eat up over 50% of their gdp.
Let's say you want to build a shed in your back yard and the cost is $1000 - which you can get your hands on at will. You can either:
A. Take the geewiz and pay for it in cash, or
B. Take the geewiz, give it to me ... ask me to use it to buy
10 IOU's from you so you can borrow it back, and then
use that same geewiz to pay cash for the shed ...AND ...
as an incentive for my going along with this, you - who
also happen to own a chain of Ricters Fine Foods - give
me $10,000 in gift certificates to use at any of your
locations as I see fit.
Which makes more sense (no disrespect intended)???
Well, B above is how the govt gets its money under the current monitary system. It doesn't work now any better than it has throughout history. The only times throughout the ages that any nations economies have flourished has been those times that the governments have pushed the money lenders aside and have created, issued and administrated the nations money themselves - without debt!!!