I assume those that are charged with the crime of spoofing
have to show they intended in advance to cancel orders.
Allow me to play devils advocate in this situation.
I play computer chess, and the program will automatically
make decisions based on my moves.
So if a crafty trader programs a computer, or some form of artificial intelligence
high-frequency platform to automatically (make decisions) to cancel orders
automatically due to market conditions, an enforcement regulation can call it spoofing?
This spoofing regulation seems to work also as a disincentive strategy for
genius level programmers who outsmart the market.