Forget trading, Trump will pay out $130,000 to anyone who simply implies that they had an affair

"In this case it is in full force and effect and will be used in Arbitration for damages against Ms. Clifford (Daniels). The agreement was used to stop the false and extortionist accusations made by her about an affair, despite already having signed a detailed letter admitting that there was no affair. Prior to its violation by Ms. Clifford and her attorney, this was a private agreement. Money from the campaign, or campaign contributions, played no roll in this transaction."

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...t-to-stormy-daniels-after-giuliani-revelation

Further proof that Trump will pay out $130,000 to anyone who simply implies that they had a non-existent affair with him.

Time to type up a National Enquirer exposé and collect your checks
 
"In this case it is in full force and effect and will be used in Arbitration for damages against Ms. Clifford (Daniels). The agreement was used to stop the false and extortionist accusations made by her about an affair, despite already having signed a detailed letter admitting that there was no affair. Prior to its violation by Ms. Clifford and her attorney, this was a private agreement. Money from the campaign, or campaign contributions, played no roll in this transaction."

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...t-to-stormy-daniels-after-giuliani-revelation

Further proof that Trump will pay out $130,000 to anyone who simply implies that they had a non-existent affair with him.

Time to type up a National Enquirer exposé and collect your checks

Now that I think about it, I remember some time ago while at EliteTrader Global Headquarters, I met Mr. Trump and he suggestively said I reminded him of his daughter. I would be willing to sign a NDA with him for $115k.
 
"In this case it is in full force and effect and will be used in Arbitration for damages against Ms. Clifford (Daniels). The agreement was used to stop the false and extortionist accusations made by her about an affair, despite already having signed a detailed letter admitting that there was no affair. Prior to its violation by Ms. Clifford and her attorney, this was a private agreement. Money from the campaign, or campaign contributions, played no roll in this transaction."

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...t-to-stormy-daniels-after-giuliani-revelation

Further proof that Trump will pay out $130,000 to anyone who simply implies that they had a non-existent affair with him.

Time to type up a National Enquirer exposé and collect your checks

Well exGOPer... this is a great time you to score an easy $130K.

What's your gripe?
 
Seems quite telling that the exGOPher would rather take a load in his mouth for 130k than try to make it as a trader.
 
Seems quite telling that the exGOPher would rather take a load in his mouth for 130k than try to make it as a trader.

"Time to type up a National Enquirer exposé and collect your checks"
 
An expert in anti-corruption enforcement writes to Josh Marshall about Michael Cohen’s work for Donald Trump:

First, bribe money can be laundered from the “client” through the lawyer as fictitious legal services. The lawyer can issue bogus invoices to the client in amounts sufficient to cover bribe payments, a commission to the lawyer, and a gross-up for any taxes the lawyer would have to pay on the fee income (bagmen, after all, don’t want to be stuck paying taxes on amounts they pay out as bribes). Sound familiar?

Second, by disguising the bribes as payments for legal fees, businesses can try to write them off as expenses (bribes are not deductible). This is tax evasion, of course, but it is common practice for the corrupt. Third, the lawyer-client relationship can be an impediment to law enforcement. It can be very difficult for prosecutors to pierce what appears on the surface to be a legitimate attorney-client relationship.

So now we have Giuliani confirming that this is exactly how Trump and Cohen operated. Hush money to Stormy Daniels is one thing and certainly raises potential serious campaign finance violations, but she is not a public official. What I find most significant about Rudy’s admission is what it says about the nature of the relationship between Trump and Cohen and how it suggests an M.O. for other more serious crimes.
 
"Time to type up a National Enquirer exposé and collect your checks"


Why bother with that hassle when according to you the easiest way to make 130k is to blow a dude whose twice your age........ how many 130k payouts have you been the beneficiary of so far?
 
Why bother with that hassle when according to you the easiest way to make 130k is to blow a dude whose twice your age........ how many 130k payouts have you been the beneficiary of so far?

Can you even read? According to me, you have to be a woman, a whore (like Melania) and look like Ivanka (his daughter) to get that money.

And is Trump in the habit of being blown by men other than Steve Doocy and the other guy at F&F? Are you speaking from personal experience here?
 
Back
Top