Forget about S&P 1000

Will the S&P see 1000 in Jan 2009?

  • No, I agree w rowshan

    Votes: 14 25.0%

  • Yes it will! we're going higher

    Votes: 21 37.5%

  • hey rowshan--take your polls and stick em

    Votes: 22 39.3%
  • Total voters
    56
B

B. Rowshan

2009 is off to a positive start (S&P @ 917.5). Obama's coming, the vix is under 40, oil is low etc etc. Looks like the ripe ingredients to propel the market higher.

Wrong!

The S&P will not see 1000 in January. It will see 840 before 1000. Take it to the bank. Either it's rowshan or it's wrong.
 
Quote from Ivanovich:

Right there.
More...
Well well look what we have here. If it isn't the person who tried to suppress the only potential big news story ET has ever had. 3 years ago, a wise man came to ET and asked/warned about madoff financial. And it was ivan the "moderator" who tried to stop the potential dissemination of such valuable info!

I particularly love the response from trademonster to ivans post.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=61866
Quote from Ivanovich:

Sounds like a drive by forum rumor to me.
More...
Quote from trademonster:

I heard from a trader on wall st. about a SEC investigation on Madoff for various SEC violations. I'm trying to find out if anyone has heard the same. I have some friends who have big money with Madoff so I thought I try to get some info. No, I don't post here since I only look at the forum. And whoever suggested that I'm starting a "rumor by forum" can kiss my ass. Get a life.
More...

The fact that the title of the madoff thread was changed to make it more visible, it is obvious ET was hoping for notoriety from this particular thread. Soooorrrry.
 
Quote from B. Rowshan:

Well well look what we have here. If it isn't the person who tried to suppress the only potential big news story ET has ever had. 3 years ago, a wise man came to ET and asked/warned about madoff financial. And it was ivan the "moderator" who tried to stop the potential dissemination of such valuable info!

I particularly love the response from trademonster to ivans post.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=61866



The fact that the title of the madoff thread was changed to make it more visible, it is obvious ET was hoping for notoriety from this particular thread. Soooorrrry.
More...

I couldn't have tried to stop the rumor. I wasn't a moderator then. But excellent attempt at redirection. You asked when you were wrong. I showed you how recent.

You and marketobserver are a match made in heaven!
 
Quote from Ivanovich:

I couldn't have tried to stop the rumor. I wasn't a moderator then.
More...
You're not quite getting it mate. You felt it necessary to tell the guy he was simply starting a rumor. And you couldn't have been more wrong. You could have been encouraging him to tell more, but you weren't. If Et's ultimate goal on this madoff thread was notoriety--you failed them miserably here no matter what your title was.
 
I've been wrong many times more than I can count. So what? I'm human. Only clowns like yourself claim to have never been wrong. It's you who doesn't get it, mate.

Guess what? I'll be wrong again! Many times over. Just ask my wife (who is always right).
 
Quote from Ivanovich:

I've been wrong many times more than I can count. So what? I'm human.
More...
Ok so what would you do in retrospect, turn back the clock to 2006.
 
You mean in regards to that thread? I wouldn't have posted. But Madoff doesn't concern me at all. I've no money invested with him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top