Quote from failed_trad3r:
then how did he make money if you didn't? this doesn't make sense. Are you a SHILL?
His commentary is negative...tough to be a shill if posting negative commentary about a service.
However, I'll answer you question about how difficult it is to be profitable following someone's real-time posted trades.
First of all, there's mainly two types of real-time signal calling services.
(1) Those that post their trades in advance (e.g. buy or sell when a particular price is reached)
(2) Those that post their trades as they are occuring (e.g. I just bought XYZ @ 54.15 or I just sold XYZ @ 54.15
It's the number (2) types above that are the most difficult and most common type of signal calling services. It's
very common for users to not be profitable while the signal caller is profitable on simulator or real money because of several reasons:
* As soon as the trade call is made...by the time you see it on your screen and then react to it...you
will not get the same price as the signal caller posted.
Now imagine the price differences between your trades and the trades of the signal caller if you're using a different broker, different charting software, different ISP connection speed, different commission levels et cetera. The trade results between your trades and that of the signal caller can easily be that someone is going to be profitable and the other is a loser. Just the same, it's the exact same reasons why clients of the signal caller have different results amongst themselves.
How do I know this?
I've been a member of many
free chat rooms over the past 10 years where there were some very good traders that
consistently posted clear trade signals from entry to exit in
real-time that were profitable. However, other members
trying to follow every posted trade of any particular profitable trader were not able to catch EVERY trade, were not able to get the same trade price or used different
trade management after entry in comparison to the signal caller.
For example of different trade management...the signal caller has deep pockets or pretends to have deep pockets and uses a 6 point stop. However, you following his trade call feels that the 6 point stop is too much. You then use a 1.5 point stop and get stopped out for a loss when the trade goes against you 1.5 points while the signal caller is still in the trade. The trade then reverses after taking you out for a loss and becomes profitable reaching whatever profit target the signal caller said to exit at.
Thus, the signal caller is profitable while you are not. There's many other examples but you get the point.
Quote from Jreality:
...I actually lost money and I think that overall I did a pretty good job at following the trader in charge of the room...
Simply, if Jreality doesn't get the EXACT same entries and exits and does not take EVERY trade...his trade results
will greatly be different than that of any signal caller regardless if the signal caller is on simulator, real money or has an audited/verifiable trading account. Thus, you can't do a
pretty good job...you must do a perfect job via taking EVERY trade via the EXACT same prices along with using the exact same broker, trading platform, same or better ISP connection speed et cetera.
By the way, there was a sponsor here at ET many years ago (not puretick) that was arguing with a ET member that said he wasn't profitable in following the signal calls. The ET member showed a copy of his broker statement and so did another member that showed up to support what the other ET member had said.
The one thing I noticed that nobody commented about was that both ET members statements of the same trading day had different trading results...one lost a few hundred while the other lost a little over 1k...yet both supposibly did a good job in following the calls. If that's true..why was there such a huge difference amongst the trade results of the clients when comparing one client to another client ???
Answer, same reason why it's possible for a signal caller like the type (2) to be profitable and the client to be a loser or vice versa. Thus, if you're going to use a signal calling service...try the type (1) instead of the type (2) and don't ask me for any recommendations.
Mark