Forex Difficulty

Quote from nukethewhales31:

I mean the sum off the odds of movement at the current moment in time... What that means is that people try to trade one time frame when you need understand the setups occurring on higher and lower time frames at least 2 up and down.. if your 140% broken out over the previous movement leg on the hourly you shouldnt look to go long trades on the 15Min... but if you understand how each one should move usually you can anticipate the whipsaw... and use the data to your advantage... if I have a H-80% 30M-90% 15M 50% 5M 70% im not going to be taking that trade long.... so what im saying is there is multiple time frames yes... and you should evaluate several time frames above and below the one you are trading..so by sum I mean in the trade example above even if the setup on 5min looks perfect its not... because of the other frames and the sum of all the frames will control the movement and how it will find its path.

Could not agree more.
 
The reason I ask is because I hear so many complaints about FX brokers "screwing" people over. No doubt some are up to some shady things, but for the most part I think it's nothing more than an excuse for people to use for their poor trading.
 
Quote from elomich:

The reason I ask is because I hear so many complaints about FX brokers "screwing" people over. No doubt some are up to some shady things, but for the most part I think it's nothing more than an excuse for people to use for their poor trading.

Exactly.

Me personally, I use ACM as a broker and their demo is an identical copy of their live platform except the demo platform cuts out of connection more than the live platform (obviously a good thing). I see reviews of people saying their connection cut out and their trade is deep in the red when they connect again. If they had half a brain to begin with they would of realized they can call ACM directly to close a trade or they could of placed a stop to begin with. People take their stupidity and lack of knowledge and often blame it on the broker. Not saying brokers don't do things that are questionable but a lot of problems are common sense issues that can be resolved by the trader.

There's more idiots in the world than there are people with common sense.
 
"would of"

Are people using this phrase deliberately or is this some sort of infectious internet-dyslexia? This is getting out of hand..
 
Quote from Pippi436:

"would of"

Are people using this phrase deliberately or is this some sort of infectious internet-dyslexia? This is getting out of hand..

I always wondered whether people recognize the proper phrase "would have, should have" not would of should of. This is as moronic as spelling indefinite as indefinate or come on as common and a boatload of other nonsense.
 
Its a genuine question i keep wondering about. Is it because people don't know it any better, or do people know its wrong but still use it as a dirty abbreviation? Or maybe people do know its wrong and it is a spontaneous, temporary incident of dyslexia on a subconscious level?
 
Back
Top