Foremost Covid Expert - overview of the situation

Why can’t you post it on a social media site which does not take down misinformation. You know… a site that is not a cesspool of white nationalism, Covid misinformation and election fraud fabrications. In other words a site that is not Rumble.
I refer back to my original question.

if there was an actual cure or treatment that was available but it went against the official narrative, do you honestly think in this politically divided environment it would be allowed on Youtube, Twitter, et al.?

I don’t.
 
If I post something, something that is absolutely true, something “UsualName” agrees with but I post it in Rumble... does that make it false, a lie?

I’m not commenting on the veracity of any site or post. Just the fact that wherever something’s posted doesn’t necessarily prove or disprove anything.

I would be very suspicious of using any information only found on rumble. You have to understand research is what builds bridges and develops medicines, it’s what got us to the moon. We have whole school systems devoted to agricultural research.

This stuff is not a joke and the people sharing this stuff and creating the content are doing a serious injury to gullible people and people with low education levels.

So, my point is verify the information you consume. Don’t get caught up in a wave of ignorance to fit in with an ideology you identify with.
 
I would be very suspicious of using any information only found on rumble. You have to understand research is what builds bridges and develops medicines, it’s what got us to the moon. We have whole school systems devoted to agricultural research.

This stuff is not a joke and the people sharing this stuff and creating the content are doing a serious injury to gullible people and people with low education levels.

So, my point is verify the information you consume. Don’t get caught up in a wave of ignorance to fit in with an ideology you identify with.

I agree with you.

My only concern is the guardians of the Internet..... who guards them?

When information is redacted, your sources limited it’s easy to mislead and control the audience.
 
I agree with you.

My only concern is the guardians of the Internet..... who guards them?

When information is redacted, your sources limited it’s easy to mislead and control the audience.

Its as easy to mislead and control an audience by providing too much irrelevant and wrong information.

Swamping people so they can't decide/stop caring. "Flood the zone with shit" is what Bannon said their tactic was. This is also censorship, which simply means surpressing information really.

Lawyers have used this for years, document dumps etc.
 
I don't know anything about Rumble, but a lot of authors who were mainstream a few decades ago have been relegated to "free speech" platforms that have a lot of nonsense on them. Like Pat Buchanan now on the Unz review.
 
Its as easy to mislead and control an audience by providing too much irrelevant and wrong information.

Swamping people so they can't decide/stop caring. "Flood the zone with shit" is what Bannon said their tactic was. This is also censorship, which simply means surpressing information really.

Lawyers have used this for years, document dumps etc.

Also, a lot of this content is targeting people with prior biases for mistrust in the government and the media. There is an industry in tabloid pseudo science and political extremism. These YouTube videos and rumble clicks make people money.

A lot of these people don’t have anything to say of substance but have a deep desire to be heard. It’s cringeworthy watching some of these people at school board meetings or even here on this forum parrot the empty talking points and phony science they consume through right wing media.

It’s all a tale of sound and fury signifying nothing.
 
I don't know anything about Rumble, but a lot of authors who were mainstream a few decades ago have been relegated to "free speech" platforms that have a lot of nonsense on them. Like Pat Buchanan now on the Unz review.

Pat Buchanan wants to make some money off of the right wing tabloid gravy train. This is not complicated stuff. There’s a large revenue stream to be tapped into for right wing misinformation and political extremism.
 
Please watch Dr McCullough and understand what has been done to you and yours and please pass it along.

Let's take a look at this idiot, Dr McCullough.

First let's start with a few of the many fact checks he has failed...


Vaccines Remain Largely Effective Against Delta Variant, Counter to Claims From Fox News Guest
https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/v...ariant-counter-to-claims-from-fox-news-guest/

Fact check: Study on breakthrough delta cases in Vietnam misrepresented online
https://www.adn.com/nation-world/20...delta-cases-in-vietnam-misrepresented-online/

Vaccines are a safer alternative for acquiring immunity compared to natural infection and COVID-19 survivors benefit from getting vaccinated, contrary to claims by Peter McCullough
https://healthfeedback.org/claimrev...nated-contrary-to-claims-by-peter-mccullough/

FALSE: An american cardiologue Peter McCullough states that it is useless to vaccinate the under 50s
Explanation: Several experts told AFP that vaccinating under 50s help stopping the epidemic
https://www.poynter.org/?ifcn_misin...that-it-is-useless-to-vaccinate-the-under-50s

Let's take a look at the restraining orders and lawsuits against him...


Baylor Gets Restraining Order Against COVID Vaccine Skeptic Doc
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/958916

Baylor health sues COVID-19 vaccine skeptic and demands Dallas doctor stop using its name
Dr. Peter McCullough denies claiming to be affiliated with Baylor Scott & White since leaving in February; says lawsuit attempts to silence him for unpopular beliefs.
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/cou...nd-demands-dallas-doctor-stop-using-its-name/
 
Back
Top