Quote from rcn10ec:
You see, these are the questions that evolution was invented to avoid. Evolution was invented to kill the God of the Bible not because evolutionists and materialists and naturalists didn't like God as creator, but because they didn't want God as judge. Evolution was invented in order to kill the God of the Bible, to eliminate the lawgiver, to eliminate the inviolability of His law, the binding standard for human thought and conduct. Evolution was invented to do away from universal morality and universal guilt and universal accountability. Evolution was invented to eliminate the judge and leave people free to do whatever they want without guilt and without consequences.
Quote from rcn10ec:
Gosh it's pretty obvious there JB...no God no judge.
Quote from traderNik:
I see. Evolution was 'invented' and it's a massive conspiracy. I don't suppose scientific inquiry had anything to do with it? Inconvenient, but you don't care, I know.
Oops, I forgot. Religious mystics don't need science, because all the information they need is received.
As far as I can tell, the most immoral, bloodthirsty, criminal people on the planet are religious fanatics. The rest of us just want to be left alone to live our lives in peace.
Thank God that people like you are a dying breed and that you're not in charge of educating our children.
Yeah, I totally agree about the religious fanatic part. I think there's gonna be Hell to pay, so to speak, for a lot of people that are doing things in the name of their god. As far as I'm concerned anybody can believe what they want. It just seems to me that it takes more faith to believe in a theory that says nobody x nothing = everything than it does divine creation. As far as science goes... I believe that God "invented" science and imho science backs up creationism more so than big bang/evolution. But hey, if you want to believe all living things originated from a one celled thing that crawled out of a pool of slime that's your business. I mean it's kinda blunt but like they say, " If you don't believe in God you better be right." And I'm referring to God in the book of Genesis. rcQuote from Turok:
LOL -- the only thing "obvious" is that you can't follow the logic of what you wrote.
Your above statement is correct .. "no God, no judge.", but your previous assertion was clearly based on *intent*, not just result.
You didn't say "the invention of evolution eliminated the judge".
You said "evolution was invented TO eliminate the judge ... ".
You said this repeatedly, over and over in many slightly different forms.
So, unless you can support your assertion that evolution was invented for those purposes, rather than to explain the orgin of the species, you're just another dime a dozen dixie whistler.
Just another example of someone who can't follow simple logic -- even as it applies to their own writings. They fall for "let there be light" nearly every time.
JB
Anyway, what is logical about nobody x nothing = everything?At that starting point of nobody x nothing, do you think it would take less faith or more faith to believe in a guess that says nobody x nothing = divine creation?Quote from rcn10ec:
....
It just seems to me that it takes more faith to believe in a theory that says nobody x nothing = everything than it does divine creation.
....
Quote from stu:
At that starting point of nobody x nothing, do you think it would take less faith or more faith to believe in a guess that says nobody x nothing = divine creation?
With respect, my query was not about what the human mind may or may not be able to comprehend. Surely we are still in the realm of the comprehensible with your proposal nobody x nothing = divine creation. I merely ask would that require less faith / be more likely, than nobody x nothing = everything. Especially when the fact is the "everything" can be observed.Quote from rcn10ec:
Given that a lot of thought too. I'm definately no theologian but what I can say is that the human mind can only comprehend or rationalize so much. It is hard to explain something that is far more superior than us humans. Besides, if we could explain the one true God... as we can the gods made up by man... then He wouldn't be much of a god. rc
Quote from stu:
With respect, my query was not about what the human mind may or may not be able to comprehend. Surely we are still in the realm of the comprehensible with your proposal nobody x nothing = divine creation. I merely ask would that require less faith / be more likely, than nobody x nothing = everything. Especially when the fact is the "everything" can be observed.