Quote from kiwi_trader:
I used 876 from first release until it was withdrawn with no problems.
I've had two orders crash with 877 and in both case the crash caused TWS to send a fault report to IB. The last was with 877.1 on Friday ... there's no way I consider it stable.
On the contrary the bug on 876 might affect Button trader but I've not heard of anyone using ZeroLine Trader, Sierra Chart or Ensign experiencing any problems. Anything after 872.6 is dodgy with the backfill timestamp error.
For crying out loud IB ... 876 is the first release without the backfill problem since 872.6 that's half stable. Now I know its not as good at backfill as 872.6 but at least it doesn't crash my orders.
wow. kiwi and i agree again- go figure. i had the exact same thing happen twice tonight with 877- completely unstable. hell, to go along with that, it still thinks i have a net long position in HSI (wrong- though, yet again, i had to call HK cust svs just to make sure), that i had a loss of 6800 HKD in the HSI (way wrong) and that i didn't trade the STW tonight (wrong). with IB i feel like i;'m a beta tester most of the time- the other times it's more like an alpha tester.
me thinks that eventually the big brokerage players will wake up to how profitable we traders are and have similar offerings at similar pricing. if that happens, IB will come to regret the approach they have taken to their customers and platform...