For all you clowns that shorted GOOG on

Quote from Ivanovich:

Probably true, financially. I usually don't correct the spelling/grammar of posters until I find one calling the others a loser or stupid or a jerk, etc.

It's then I enjoy pointing it out!

-Ivan
More...

You are a looser if you correct other peoples grammer.

War GOOG!!!

edit - post 333...that is half way to the sign of the devil. I should probably retire now.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from EtfTraderLives:

GOOG short mid $353 avg
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

With this, and the QQQQ short, wonder if EtfTrader still lives...
 
Go back and read some of the diatribes about GOOG its first 6 months.

Then tell me if those folks are not deserving of ridicule.

Spades a spade.
 
Quote from stock777:

Go back and read some of the diatribes about GOOG its first 6 months.

Then tell me if those folks are not deserving of ridicule.

Spades a spade.
More...

You're completely correct.

What I love is the rational the whole way up, "GOOG is SO expensive." Certainly not on a forward P/E yardstick. GOOG was cheap to YHOO for most of the year. People fail to realize this wasn't analogous to those dot-com stocks of 2000 that were trading at stratospheric prices although they were posting losses. If GOOG had gone public with 10x more shares outstanding and a corresponding opening level in the teens, fewer people would have thought it was a sell. The misperception of price, LOL.

Perhaps this thread will be the kiss of death though.:)
 
Just a thought but .. when I look at the current NEWSTAND (Mag rack) and I see GOOGLE on the cover of more then 3 mags. I think its time to consider a put. 400 maybe?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top