Food for Thought: WTC Was Designed to Withstand Direct Impact from a 707 (vid)

achilles28 · Mar 28, 2006

Quote from bronks:

You're right, I've done no research.

But somehow, my position is clearer and more logically thought out than yours.

Is that why you routinely 'refute' my scientific facts with baseless conjecture?

Clearly, you're in a much better position to argue the facts of sept 11 - considering you haven't done any research into what those facts actually are.

LOL.

At least you're honest.

JohnnyK · Mar 28, 2006

Quote from EqtTrdr:

this whole thing needs to work backwards starting from the collape of WTC7 which wasnt even touched enough to fall..

figure out what happend with that and you open a pandora's box imo......

Yes. Who, or what really lit the alledged deisel fires in that building? How would diesel ignite even if something came down and penetrated a tank? But the main tank was underground, and any others were inside the building. But if nothing even hit the roof of the building, how could these fires ignite?

JohnnyK

JohnnyK · Mar 28, 2006

Quote from bronks:

Not just an assortment of individuals, highly specialized individuals. There's not that many in the entire world skilled enough to bring down buildings of that size with explosives.

And why wouldn't the terrorists take the claim for also planting the explosives? I mean after all, that is their forte? Think of the credibility they would gain and would take the heat off of THEY.

C'mon bronks, think! If you were 'they', how would you explain how muslim fanatics planted bombs that would perfectly drop the towers into their footprints. Wouldn't they want to tip them over like trees during rush hour? It's not believable that muslim fanatics could get into the towers and set charges like that....and if they could, it would incriminate 'they' even more. 'They' bet planes could fool the public, and they were right until now.

If this was for real, someone would have actually stepped forward already. Just too many illogical pieces trying to form an illogical puzzle.

You mean they would have stepped foreward like Lee Harvey Oswald? First, who would believe them? Then, what kind of threats can be made to them and their loved ones to shut up? Also, who says someone hasn't? Then, how do you know they aren't already liquidated before they can make a statement? Finally, someone has stepped foreward already...Osama Bin Laden. Now, the evidence is stepping foreward. Exactly who would you believe, if they stepped foreward? Colin Powell?

JohnnyK

JohnnyK · Mar 28, 2006

Quote from bronks:

Who is THEY? And how would it be to their advantage?

So THEY aligned themselves with the terrorists either directly or indirectly? And then coordinated the whole thing without a hitch?

wow.

Think JFK. Someone coordinated that whole thing without a hitch. And it wasn't Oswald.

Lot's of people can work together to coordinate audacious actions in front of the public. With some experience, they can even determine what they can actually get away with, based on historical public reaction to misinformation. Using others as dupes to carry out small tasks and then take the fall...that's basic MO. Dupes who are bunglers would need extra help to carry out a large task. Dupes can be made to think they are the ones carrying out a task. They are dupes.

JohnnyK

JohnnyK · Mar 29, 2006

Quote from Thunderdog:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=66296

Please take the time to read the hyperlinked article. I watched the segment on 60 Minutes, and the misinformation they reported on is downright scary.

I checked it out, you are right. The gov is involved with misinformation regarding global warming. Here is a quote from the President in spite of what the scientists are saying:

Quote from the President:

Am I the only one here who believes that a little bit of "information" or "knowledge" can be a dangerous thing? I think that you guys are speaking with a bit too much authority about a topic that is laced with propaganda and about which none of us here really knows enough of the facts.

JohnnyK

macal425 · Mar 29, 2006

Kennedy (Democrat) gets shot by a madman and its a vast right wing conspiracy. Reagan (Republican) gets shot by a madman and...well... he gets shot by a madman.
WTC gets attacked by terrorists, under a Republican President (Bush) and its a vast Right Wing conspiracy. WTC gets attacked by terrorists, under a Democrat President (Clinton), and...well...it gets attacked by terrorists.

Where were all you conspiracy nuts when the USS Cole got bombed. Where were you when the Embassies got bombed. Do you think you would have been as quiet if it was done under a Republican President? I'm sure if you looked hard enough at those cases you could come up with some blurry picture that throws doubt on the official explanation.

Checkmate
Case Closed
blah, blah, blah

Thunderdog · Mar 29, 2006

Quote from JohnnyK:

I checked it out, you are right. The gov is involved with misinformation regarding global warming. Here is a quote from the President in spite of what the scientists are saying:

JohnnyK

Admittedly, you have a pretty good sense of humor. However, you did not really respond to the issues I addressed in my post to you. Care to try again?

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1022558#post1022558

In any event, I know I'm out of my depth here. I will leave it to you guys to battle it out amongst yourselves. As an aside, if you guys are so passionate in your belief about a conspiracy, then why not channel your considerable energies beyond ET Chit Chat and into the real world? Go do some good.

ratboy88 · Mar 29, 2006

Quote from Thunderdog:

Admittedly, you have a pretty good sense of humor. However, you did not really respond to the issues I addressed in my post to you. Care to try again?

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1022558#post1022558

In any event, I know I'm out of my depth here. I will leave it to you guys to battle it out amongst yourselves. As an aside, if you guys are so passionate in your belief about a conspiracy, then why not channel your considerable energies beyond ET Chit Chat and into the real world? Go do some good.

another dumbass assumption, you have no idea what some are doing. go educate yourself and comeback when your brain isnt so foggy.

Thunderdog · Mar 29, 2006

Quote from ratboy88:

another dumbass assumption, you have no idea what some are doing. go educate yourself and comeback when your brain isnt so foggy.

Thus far, I have not been rude to anyone in this thread. However, in light of your above quoted post, you are cordially invited to kiss my ass. As an aside, you have chosen your name well.

ratboy88 · Mar 29, 2006

Quote from Thunderdog:

Thus far, I have not been rude to anyone in this thread. However, in light of your above quoted post, you are cordially invited to kiss my ass. As an aside, you have chosen your name well.

i would apologize except i tired of your nausea after about the forth stupid post. you did no research as instructed but chose to recycle your previous platitudes.