Quote from brownsfan019:
Bit - I can see what you are saying.
The purpose of this journal is to force myself to get rid of all these P&L's and focus on trading and letting my trading methodology to determine entries and exits. I am very confident in the trading setups that I use, I just have to give it time and room to work.
Example: I could get a setup on the ER2 and let's say my profit target is 2.4 points on this trade. My max loss is .8 pts. After the trade moves 1.2 points in my favor, I may watch the P&L and see around $1000 on this trade. Then, the ER2 comes down a bit and I watch my $1000 gain turn into $200 rather quickly. The immediate reaction I had was to flatten for fear of it going down even further and turning this into a losing trade. Now, what will happen A LOT is that I will flatten, this quick little retracement takes me out, and then continues into the direction of the profit target and hits the profit target. All of a sudden I have turned a profitable 2.4 ER2 trade into plus 2 ticks before commissions. Obviously this is frustrating on so many levels. This was a profitable trade, yet my P&L does not reflect it; which in turn creates frustration and means that if my next trade is a loss, I am negative on the day, yet I should be positive.
A few things I should highlight about my trading:
1) All trades have a max loss threshold that is predetermined based on the market.
2) While the max loss is always in place, the actual stop loss placement is dependent on the trade setup; therefore some trades do not even start at the max loss threshold.
3) My analysis has shown that for every one win, I can absorb 2-3 losses and be near break-even. This assumes that on winning trades, the PO is hit; which means that I have to give it time to work (sometimes over an hour). If I turn the winning trade into plus 2 ticks and my 2 losses are minus 6 ticks... you can see how the end result can vary dramatically.