Quote from gnome:
Well, I don't know.... some say that's exactly what should happen... and letting Fannie and Freddie collapse would be the lesser of evils...
There is a principle here....
1. In a capitalistic economy, we should let the failures fail and pay the consequences. In that way, the "non-failures" maintain their resources and become the seed and resource for the future recovery.
2. In a Socialistic (or Economic Facist) economy, the impact of the failed is mitigated by consuming all available resources.... and in such cases, there is little substance from which to fund a recovery.
Our Gummint has chosen the latter... politically more palatable, postpones the obvious consequences, but may ultimately be more destructive...
So...if you "have nothing" and have resigned your destiny to "never having anything... always hoping for a bigger Gummint hand out", #2 seems preferable.
If you believe your assets should not be confiscated by the Gummint to "cushion the blow" from the irresponsible, greedy, and criminally larcenous... all for the "good of the economy", of course.. then you're a fan of Door #1.
good post