Thanks, I'll take your word it was 19 pages.
What does Comey have to do with whether Barr is biased? Please don't bring up Hillary's emails.
Flynn's Secret Text Messages Show Trump Colluded With Russia, Experts Say
- Thread starter Tony Stark
- Start date
Thanks, I'll take your word it was 19 pages.
What does Comey have to do with whether Barr is biased? Please don't bring up Hillary's emails.
I never followed the Edwards case, so I'm not qualified to comment on it. However I have followed Trumps misdeeds closely. Trump has mostly avoided personal liability via the structure of his fiascoes. He brags, and lies of course, about never settling out of court. The truth is just the opposite. The many law violations of his businesses are encyclopedic, and these are just the violations where he's been caught. Here are just a few of the instances where he's been caught and had to pay fines or restitution. There was for example the violations of the fair Housing Act, the 106 violations of money laundering by his casino, the Trump "University" fraud, the fraudulent Donald J. Trump Foundation, and on and on forever it would seem...I've barely scratched the surface.
They say the apple does not fall far from the tree-- Certainly true in trump's case. Crime runs in his family, starting with his Grandfather, then his father, Fred , and now Trump. Trump differs from his granddad and his father in having a severe mental disorder and in the much larger number of his businesses that went belly up, some almost immediately, leaving his investors holding the bag. There is a reason no U.S. Bank would loan him more money, and he became totally dependent on foreign money.. ("Hey, Donald, you get that Magnitski Act nullified and the Sanctions lifted and we can do a deal.) At the time of one of his bankruptcies he owned 72 banks money! Yikes!
I understand why people that knew little about Trump's background or his mental disorder might have cast their ballot for him in 2016 to voice their disapproval of dysfunction in Washington and as a rejection of the Democrat's candidate. It's especially understandable considering there was a massive media campaign by Russian Hackers to spread dis-information about his rival 'That's all understandable. But voting for Trump turned out to be a dumb mistake. Trump has done nothing but create chaos and disharmony in Washington and the world. He has continued his long established pattern of bad decisions, and prizing loyalty and flattery beyond competence.. While it might have been excusable to vote for the man in 2016, it is inexcusable now for any American, regardless of their politics, to continue to defend, support and vote for such a low life.
https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/FH-NY-0024-0034.pdf
https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-inc-podcast-money-laundering-and-the-trump-taj-mahal
etc. etc. etc.
Last edited:
You can read the Barr memo here and decide for yourself if Barr is biased -- https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthe...j-mue/b4c05e39318dd2d136b3/optimized/full.pdf
IMO Barr is providing proper legal guidance on obstruction definitions, limits on executive authority, legal limits on investigating the executive branch, and other pertinent matters.
Thanks...hope to get to it this weekend.
WOW, take the blinders off and look around dude.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/12/30/trumps_top_10_achievements_of_2018_139046.html
next time try it BEFORE you lob your opinion.
My opinion that Barr is biased is valid. His mind was essentially made up before the report was created.
Bias means he favors a particular position...rightly or wrongly.
I'll read his manifesto to see whether I agree with him ... not to determine whether he biased. It's clear already that he's biased.
Now, how 'bout my previous question: What does Comey have to do with whether or not Barr is biased?
Based on what? Reading what's on the toilet paper this morning?
Comey has nothing to do with Barr being biased, he has to do with your unwillingness/inability to identify bias. Except your own.
Based on his prior position that Trump could not have obstructed ... even before he read the evidence. Not what was his opinion based on ... since it couldn't have been based on the evidence?
You mentioned Comey in relation to Barr. Now you suggest that Comey has something to do with me. You're making it difficult to have an intelligent discussion.