Florida Man Who Raised $100 Million To Short The VIX Likely Returning To Old Job At Target

ETN's are the right way to trade this. For a small management fee you cap your max loss at 100%. You can set the leverage by managing the weight of the ETN in your portfolio.
Exactly ...I was long SVXY (i exited it before it crashed), but if it had gone to zero it would have been 5% of my account size i.e. would not have killed me.
 
There is nothing wrong, in principal, with consistently selling vol* to capture the roll - if you are aware of the risks and manage them. The total return to shorting the VIX is still significantly positive - it's not like accidents such as those on Monday wipe out all your accumulated profits if you've been doing this for 15 years. That means in practice you should probably not do so via leveraged ETNs (on which the pre-set leverage means you can and will be wiped out) but via futures where you can set the leverage at the appropriate level. That means you should scale your position so that an overnight doubling, or tripling, of vol is something you can survive.

(* Ok you can do slightly better: don't trade the very front contract which although it has the best roll also has the highest skew, maybe throw in a trend following filter on the underlying to try and get yourself out of the car accident before it happens [this probably wouldn't have worked on monday, but at least it means you won't get back in again until there is a clear downward trend in vol established], only sell when the future is in contango [backwardation is a sign of high stress, and also means you're not being paid for shorting, though again this won't get you out in advance, but will stop you getting back in too early], and sell less when the VIX is really low in absolute terms [though this is often when the roll is the highest]; but none of these will be a get out of jail free card that allows you to earn the premium from shorting vol whilst avoiding the horrendous drawdowns)

GAT
why would you want to short vol instead of just buying a 3x leveraged etn like tqqq or doing it yourself with futures?

it's almost the same returns (this year it outperformed) without the ridiculous drawdowns
 
I would have imagined that guys who "sell vol for a living" ought to lurk around doing nothing much, until one of the black swans eventually hits accompanied with a huge VIX spike, like Monday, and then back up the truck to short it once you get a feel for where things are.

Why would someone constantly short VIX long term on a daily basis, to short every minor pop, in record low volatility regime that everyone has been saying for months and months is a record breaking statistical anomaly in calmness?

Even though spot VIX was low in 2017 and early this year, the carry from shorting VIX futures remained high, because the VIX futures term structure was in steep contango. Often about 10% a month. I did have a few $100K in XIV. I was lucky enough to get out of XIV at about 100 (the liquidation price will be 4.22) on Monday at 3pm, not because I saw what was coming but because I observed that it trading well above the indicative value XIV.IV.
 
thanks for this! question:

"On a more serious note (and this is the second of the two problemsmentioned above), levered and inverse VIX ETPs present (or actually “presented” because it’s to a certain extent past tense now) a sizable rebalance risk"

Can anyone explain why levered long volatility funds, like uvxy and tvix, have this problem? if by rebalance risk tbey just mean the risk that every day the fund has to tweak its holdings a bit to get back to 30 day average expiration, i get that. but is there more?

thanks.
 
why would you want to short vol instead of just buying a 3x leveraged etn like tqqq or doing it yourself with futures?

it's almost the same returns (this year it outperformed) without the ridiculous drawdowns

selling vol in 2018 was a bad trade.
 
Why should regulators need to babysit idiots? You can't fix stupidity...
Typically I'd agree with this 100%, but this isn't one of those cases. Even fully understanding the prospectus, there's a hard wired gap in human perception of risk vs. perception of reward. No amount of disclosure will get past this.

Also, making this an ETN gives the illusion of a zero-value point where losses end. They do in absolute terms because CS retains the risk beyond that. But the problem is it looks like the scale goes from 0-115, and risk is perceived as a percentage of that, where in reality there's no reason the underlying assets couldn't get to -100 as a nav value or even lower. So the range of values to calculate risk as a percentage of might better be -100 to + 115. And suddenly the 80% termination event becomes 50%...
 
ETN's are the right way to trade this. For a small management fee you cap your max loss at 100%. You can set the leverage by managing the weight of the ETN in your portfolio.

It's a fair point, but I then I guess if you want to carry on doing the trade afterwards you are a bit stuck, unless there is an endless supply of people starting these ETNs after each market crash.

GAT
 
The VIX trade had become the very over crowded mugs game. The market will always inflict as much pain as possible to shake out as many traders as possible, but first it has to lure in the last mug.

It was clear that market had to shake out both sides of the volatility mugs, there may be another rinse cycle or two to go before this is done.

Bear markets are well versed in destroying shorts before making its move just as bull markets destroy longs before taking off.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top