I would just like to note that when trump puts an immigration ban on certain terrorist countries, the argument from the left is never 'will this work?' It's always that you can't ban a muslim, even when it's not a true muslim ban, and that constitutional argument is sacrosanct.
But with gun bans, suddenly the constitution is not sacrosanct, and we're supposed to argue every point about gun bans and whether it will work.
And crooked liberal judges who uphold these contradictory and fraudulant views.
But with gun bans, suddenly the constitution is not sacrosanct, and we're supposed to argue every point about gun bans and whether it will work.
And crooked liberal judges who uphold these contradictory and fraudulant views.