The explosion in the debt/GDP ration during the '30's was a result of the crash in GDP. We may well see that in coming years but so far we have not seen that. You are presenting a chart of then without the comparison chart of now. If you had a current chart you would see that there is no similarity.
It looks to me that the Bush/Obama strategy of recharging the economy by using massive government borrowing to spend and lend has in fact had many of the desired SHORT TERM effects.
The piper will be paid. But not in 2010 and probably not in 2011 either. And the form of payment could just as easily be currency debasement as deflation.
If you set out to prove a hypothesis you should actually think about whether what you are posting proves it. In this case you prove nothing. You assert but then stop.
It looks to me that the Bush/Obama strategy of recharging the economy by using massive government borrowing to spend and lend has in fact had many of the desired SHORT TERM effects.
The piper will be paid. But not in 2010 and probably not in 2011 either. And the form of payment could just as easily be currency debasement as deflation.
If you set out to prove a hypothesis you should actually think about whether what you are posting proves it. In this case you prove nothing. You assert but then stop.
Quote from deadbroke:
If you're not sure why CASH is KING, look at this chart (courtesy of EWI)
recall from previous lifetime what happened in 1929 when the credit bubble burst?Yeah baby, DEFLATION
Now look at the current bubble.
So why is CASH = KING?
Because the gazillion IOUs will go worthless, thereby sending into orbit the value of the remaining dollars
![]()
Yeah baby, DEFLATION