Quote from HedgeItYourself:
I mean this in the nicest possible way, but those are not good reasons:
1) You're afraid of receiving input on a strategy that, by your own account, is not working for you because you'll start adding elements in a willy-nilly fashion? If that is the case, it suggests discipline problems of a magnitude that may well prevent you from ever trading successfully.
This may be well the case. But seriously I have been around longer than you can believe, I have seen this many times. People start with a strategy to find themselves trading a completely different one.
My strategy was inspired by Annekdoten, few years ago he started a thread with price action only, that has a lot of foundation, at the end of the billion pages thread the strategy evolved to a completely different one than the original. It is human nature that when you see something working you want to jump and include it in your arsenal. That's good when you are profitable and well disciplined but not when you are not. There were excellent thread few years ago, but not anymore. I didn't invent anything I just refined what was public domain (books, boards, etc...)
2) You're afraid that newbies will see your underperforming strategy as some kind of Holy Grail? I'm sorry, the logic of this concern eludes me as well.
Performing or under performing is not the problem. When you are desperate for a strategy, you grab anything that's out there. A strategy that works for you, won't necessarily work for me, that's what I meant. My strategy is not rocket science, I'll answer any questions regarding my trades.
Am I correct in my hunch that there are, in fact, other concerns at
work here?
The more serious concern is that my strategy is difficult to state in bullets. It is years of experience in reading the markets. At the same time, it is as simple as: find the direction of the market (up or down), by pullbacks when they come down at your risk tolerance. See? are you going to buy that? it is the truth!