Smart Money,
How extensive is your knowledge of statistics? In statistics a result is considered to be statistically significant if it is unlikely to have occured by chance. The larger the sample, the less likely it is that your statistics are random.
So, with your one evening of paper trading, do you think we could call that result statistically significant?
I`m not trying to knock you down here, just something to think about.
I`m quite sure that you will be able to use your knowledge from swing trading in your day trading venture, but there are many differences between the two, although the study of price action may be much the same.
One obvious difference is that the impact of your emotions are greatly increased when you are risking money on a short time frame. You need to make split second decisions under pressure and it is very easy to let your emotions dictate your behaviour.
This is something you have not experienced yet, as you`re paper trading.
However, you should start paper trading like you`re doing now.
If you can trade profitably for 4 weeks or longer trading REALISTICALLY (using the same strategy, discipline, stops, targets, number of contracts, etc), then you may be ready to start trading live. However, you should expect drawdown to happen and when it happen, it will affect you in a different way when real money is on the line. It might cause you to overtrade and lose more money or you may start cutting your profits short on your next trade, also losing money.
That`s why it`s very smart to trade the smallest possible size when you go live, since it is "cheaper" to make mistakes. Increase size only after you`ve earned the right to do so.
If you`re currently earning an income from your swing trading, I would not be in a hurry to make it as a day trader. The slow approach may actually be the fast approach, not to mention the cheapest
Good luck!
PS: Using Ninjatrader I believe my fills have been quite realistic on the ES, but I have no clue regarding other contracts.
Best regards,
LF
How extensive is your knowledge of statistics? In statistics a result is considered to be statistically significant if it is unlikely to have occured by chance. The larger the sample, the less likely it is that your statistics are random.
So, with your one evening of paper trading, do you think we could call that result statistically significant?

I`m not trying to knock you down here, just something to think about.
I`m quite sure that you will be able to use your knowledge from swing trading in your day trading venture, but there are many differences between the two, although the study of price action may be much the same.
One obvious difference is that the impact of your emotions are greatly increased when you are risking money on a short time frame. You need to make split second decisions under pressure and it is very easy to let your emotions dictate your behaviour.
This is something you have not experienced yet, as you`re paper trading.
However, you should start paper trading like you`re doing now.
If you can trade profitably for 4 weeks or longer trading REALISTICALLY (using the same strategy, discipline, stops, targets, number of contracts, etc), then you may be ready to start trading live. However, you should expect drawdown to happen and when it happen, it will affect you in a different way when real money is on the line. It might cause you to overtrade and lose more money or you may start cutting your profits short on your next trade, also losing money.
That`s why it`s very smart to trade the smallest possible size when you go live, since it is "cheaper" to make mistakes. Increase size only after you`ve earned the right to do so.
If you`re currently earning an income from your swing trading, I would not be in a hurry to make it as a day trader. The slow approach may actually be the fast approach, not to mention the cheapest

Good luck!
PS: Using Ninjatrader I believe my fills have been quite realistic on the ES, but I have no clue regarding other contracts.
Best regards,
LF
