What does it say? It can default under unfavourable market conditions? There is still price to pay for that.
Read about it and find out.
Confusing fairness with a court. The complaints are going to plaster CSFB and Barclays along with the brokerage houses and exchanges. No one is ever going to be suitable to lose 100% of their account.
The product was not even suitable for CSFB. Got rid of it in a moment. LOL!Then maybe those products are not suitable for them to trade in the first place. It's their fault for not assessing their risk tolerance level and gamble away their money.
The product was not even suitable for CSFB. Got rid of it in a moment. LOL!
Actions tell me the story louder than words. Where is it now? Can't find it anywhere. But I am sure you never traded it. So why do you care?CSFB did not get rid of those products. Again, read the prospectus to find out what happened to XIV. If you don't understand the prospectus or don't want to read it, don't post a comment here; you'll just end up looking like a fool.
Any securities can blow up the market really as we saw in the financial crisis 2008 and it was just mortgages. And what happened on Feb. 5 is hardly a "blow up"; the S&P only dropped 1% LOL and it was NOT caused by the VIX products.
These lawsuit is just ignorant idiots who's pissed cuz they lost some money due to them not reading and understanding what they read and still went ahead and gambled their money anyway. Now they are crying wolf because they can't get the money back cuz the fund is terminated. There are other funds there that they can still trade to get their money back? No, they choose to rather waste their money on lawyers and waste the taxpayers' resources on the judiciary system that really has nothing better to do other than listening to a bunch of whining crybabies. LOL
You made my point... 2008 was caused by regulators and politicians forcing banks to finance high risk customers with overpriced real estate collateral. XIV is a poorly conceived product and deserves to die.
For the record, regulators and politicians NEVER forced anything on the banks. It's the banks who CHOSE to underwrite fraudulent mortgages without regards to risks and lost everything that's NOT regulators and politicians' problem.