"You cant say its too risky without knowing his logic"
I can't speak on why you can't, but I certainly can. Anybody who has to cash out the value of their house to raise money doesn't have any free capital to begin with. If his financial situation was better, he would not need to extract cash from a home to buy stocks would he?
If he rolled in here and said, I put 375k into a double leveraged ETF, nobody would have said anything except, awesome timing, good job ! Having free capital and investing it at the right time is what it's all about.
But he didn't do that did he? He said he extracted his house value and rolled the dice on a double leveraged ETF.
Again, I don't know why you can't see the difference there, but yeah, night and day. It isn't the fact that he put a lot of money into the ETF, lots of people do that. What makes his case different is, he didn't have the money in the first place. THAT's why it's risky, full stop.
By the way, if you think his "max pain" point is 450 for the markets, you aren't a trader and don't know anything about psychology. There is no F'ing way he would have been able to stomach a nearly 100% drawdown of his HOME value before pulling the plug.
What would have happened most likely is, he draws down 20-30%, panics, sells, and watches his wife leave him with the kids while the markets recover.
450? Please, he would never have made it past 600 on the S&P before crapping his pants and bailing...
I can't speak on why you can't, but I certainly can. Anybody who has to cash out the value of their house to raise money doesn't have any free capital to begin with. If his financial situation was better, he would not need to extract cash from a home to buy stocks would he?
If he rolled in here and said, I put 375k into a double leveraged ETF, nobody would have said anything except, awesome timing, good job ! Having free capital and investing it at the right time is what it's all about.
But he didn't do that did he? He said he extracted his house value and rolled the dice on a double leveraged ETF.
Again, I don't know why you can't see the difference there, but yeah, night and day. It isn't the fact that he put a lot of money into the ETF, lots of people do that. What makes his case different is, he didn't have the money in the first place. THAT's why it's risky, full stop.
By the way, if you think his "max pain" point is 450 for the markets, you aren't a trader and don't know anything about psychology. There is no F'ing way he would have been able to stomach a nearly 100% drawdown of his HOME value before pulling the plug.
What would have happened most likely is, he draws down 20-30%, panics, sells, and watches his wife leave him with the kids while the markets recover.
450? Please, he would never have made it past 600 on the S&P before crapping his pants and bailing...
